Verhoeven M T W, Gerritzen M A, Hellebrekers L J, Kemp B
1Wageningen University and Research Centre,Livestock Research,PO Box 65,8200 AB Lelystad,The Netherlands.
3Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Utrecht University,PO Box 80154,3508 TD Utrecht,The Netherlands.
Animal. 2015 Feb;9(2):320-30. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002596. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
Assessing unconsciousness is important to safeguard animal welfare shortly after stunning at the slaughter plant. Indicators that can be visually evaluated are most often used when assessing unconsciousness, as they can be easily applied in slaughter plants. These indicators include reflexes originating from the brain stem (e.g. eye reflexes) or from the spinal cord (e.g. pedal reflex) and behavioural indicators such as loss of posture, vocalisations and rhythmic breathing. When physically stunning an animal, for example, captive bolt, most important indicators looked at are posture, righting reflex, rhythmic breathing and the corneal or palpebral reflex that should all be absent if the animal is unconscious. Spinal reflexes are difficult as a measure of unconsciousness with this type of stunning, as they may occur more vigorous. For stunning methods that do not physically destroy the brain, for example, electrical and gas stunning, most important indicators looked at are posture, righting reflex, natural blinking response, rhythmic breathing, vocalisations and focused eye movement that should all be absent if the animal is unconscious. Brain stem reflexes such as the cornea reflex are difficult as measures of unconsciousness in electrically stunned animals, as they may reflect residual brain stem activity and not necessarily consciousness. Under commercial conditions, none of the indicators mentioned above should be used as a single indicator to determine unconsciousness after stunning. Multiple indicators should be used to determine unconsciousness and sufficient time should be left for the animal to die following exsanguination before starting invasive dressing procedures such as scalding or skinning. The recording and subsequent assessment of brain activity, as presented in an electroencephalogram (EEG), is considered the most objective way to assess unconsciousness compared with reflexes and behavioural indicators, but is only applied in experimental set-ups. Studies performed in an experimental set-up have often looked at either the EEG or reflexes and behavioural indicators and there is a scarcity of studies that correlate these different readout parameters. It is recommended to study these correlations in more detail to investigate the validity of reflexes and behavioural indicators and to accurately determine the point in time at which the animal loses consciousness.
评估昏迷状态对于在屠宰场致昏后不久保障动物福利至关重要。在评估昏迷状态时,最常使用可通过视觉评估的指标,因为它们可轻松应用于屠宰场。这些指标包括源自脑干的反射(如眼反射)或脊髓的反射(如踏板反射)以及行为指标,如姿势丧失、发声和有节律的呼吸。例如,当对动物进行物理致昏(如使用栓式击晕枪)时,所观察的最重要指标是姿势、翻正反射、有节律的呼吸以及角膜或睑反射,如果动物处于昏迷状态,这些反射都应消失。对于这种致昏方式,脊髓反射难以作为昏迷状态的衡量指标,因为它们可能会更剧烈地出现。对于不会对大脑造成物理破坏的致昏方法,如电击致昏和气体致昏,所观察的最重要指标是姿势、翻正反射、自然眨眼反应、有节律的呼吸、发声和聚焦眼动,如果动物处于昏迷状态,这些都应消失。脑干反射如角膜反射难以作为电击致昏动物昏迷状态的衡量指标,因为它们可能反映的是脑干残余活动,而不一定是意识状态。在商业条件下,上述任何指标都不应单独用作确定致昏后昏迷状态的指标。应使用多个指标来确定昏迷状态,并且在开始诸如烫毛或剥皮等侵入性屠宰程序之前,应留出足够的时间让动物在放血后死亡。与反射和行为指标相比,脑电图(EEG)所呈现的大脑活动记录及后续评估被认为是评估昏迷状态最客观的方法,但仅应用于实验设置中。在实验设置中进行的研究通常只关注脑电图或反射及行为指标,很少有研究将这些不同的读出参数进行关联。建议更详细地研究这些相关性,以探究反射和行为指标的有效性,并准确确定动物失去意识的时间点。