Mohile Supriya G, Petrylak Daniel P
Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2006 May;8(3):213-20. doi: 10.1007/s11912-006-0022-8.
Biochemical failure after curative-intent therapies is an increasingly common dilemma confronting patients and physicians. No definition of biochemical failure exists that can be applied to all forms of treatment and that is not to some degree affected by the follow-up interval, pretreatment prognostic factors, or the frequency of prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Available imaging techniques lack sensitivity in detection of occult micrometastases. Prognostic factors such as tumor characteristics and PSA kinetics should be considered when recommending second-line therapies. For those patients with suspected localized recurrence, second-line treatment with salvage therapies may provide long-term disease control. Hormonal therapy, although most commonly employed for PSA recurrence, is of palliative benefit only. Currently, the most appropriate therapeutic intervention for asymptomatic patients with evidence of biochemical failure remains undefined.
根治性治疗后的生化复发是患者和医生日益面临的常见难题。目前尚无适用于所有治疗形式且不受随访间隔、治疗前预后因素或前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测频率影响的生化复发定义。现有的成像技术在检测隐匿性微转移方面缺乏敏感性。在推荐二线治疗时,应考虑肿瘤特征和PSA动力学等预后因素。对于那些怀疑局部复发的患者,挽救性治疗作为二线治疗可能提供长期疾病控制。激素治疗虽然最常用于PSA复发,但仅具有姑息性益处。目前,对于有生化复发证据的无症状患者,最合适的治疗干预仍不明确。