• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

命名与认知的习得年龄:一种新假说。

Age of acquisition for naming and knowing: a new hypothesis.

作者信息

Funnell Elaine, Hughes Diana, Woodcock Jayne

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Feb;59(2):268-95. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000674.

DOI:10.1080/02724980443000674
PMID:16618634
Abstract

This paper reports an investigation into the age of acquisition of object names and object knowledge in a cross-sectional study of 288 children aged between 3 years 7 months and 11 years 6 months, comprising equal numbers of boys and girls. The objects belonged to four categories: animals, fruit and vegetables, implements, and vehicles. They were presented in three image types: line drawings, black-and-white photographs, and coloured photographs. In the knowledge test, five probe questions were asked for each object given the spoken name. Results showed that line drawings were more difficult to name than either black-and-white photographs or coloured photographs, which did not differ. The boys significantly out-performed the girls at naming and knowing, both overall and specifically for the category of vehicles. Naming and knowledge increased steadily with age but while young children below about 6 years 6 months showed an advantage to naming, older children showed an advantage to knowing. Similarly, age-of-acquisition measures for each item revealed a significant shift in the relationship between naming and knowing at around 80 months. We argue that differences in learning experience lead younger and older children to associate object names with different types of information, and we suggest that this difference probably accounts for the age-of-acquisition effects reported in adult object naming.

摘要

本文报告了一项针对288名年龄在3岁7个月至11岁6个月之间儿童的横断面研究,该研究调查了物体名称和物体知识的习得年龄,其中男孩和女孩数量相等。这些物体分为四类:动物、水果和蔬菜、工具及交通工具。它们以三种图像类型呈现:线条画、黑白照片和彩色照片。在知识测试中,对于每个说出名称的物体,会问五个探测性问题。结果显示,线条画比黑白照片或彩色照片更难命名,而黑白照片和彩色照片之间没有差异。在命名和知识掌握方面,男孩总体上显著优于女孩,在交通工具类别上尤其如此。命名和知识随着年龄稳步增长,但在大约6岁6个月以下的幼儿中,命名方面有优势,而年龄较大的儿童在知识掌握方面有优势。同样,每个项目的习得年龄测量结果显示,在大约80个月时,命名和知识之间的关系发生了显著变化。我们认为,学习经历的差异导致年龄较小和较大的儿童将物体名称与不同类型的信息联系起来,并且我们认为这种差异可能解释了在成人物体命名中报告的习得年龄效应。

相似文献

1
Age of acquisition for naming and knowing: a new hypothesis.命名与认知的习得年龄:一种新假说。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Feb;59(2):268-95. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000674.
2
Does sex influence the age of acquisition of common names? A contrast of different semantic categories.性别是否会影响通用名称习得的年龄?不同语义类别的对比。
Cortex. 2008 Oct;44(9):1161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.016. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
3
Age of acquisition effects on an object-name verification task.习得年龄对物体名称验证任务的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2006 Feb;97(Pt 1):1-18. doi: 10.1348/000712605X53515.
4
The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning: to honor or not to honor?词汇学习中的互斥原则:遵循还是不遵循?
Child Dev. 1990 Oct;61(5):1474-90.
5
Words and gestures: infants' interpretations of different forms of symbolic reference.言语与手势:婴儿对不同形式象征指称的理解
Child Dev. 1998 Apr;69(2):295-308.
6
Young children's disambiguation of object name reference.幼儿对物体名称指代的歧义消除。
Child Dev. 1991 Dec;62(6):1288-301.
7
Object and action picture naming in three- and five-year-old children.3岁和5岁儿童对物体和动作图片的命名
J Child Lang. 2008 May;35(2):373-402. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008549.
8
Monolingual and bilingual children's use of mutual exclusivity in the naming of whole objects.单语和双语儿童在对整个物体命名时对互斥性的运用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 Sep;92(1):25-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.007.
9
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
10
How do parents respond to children's questions about the identity of artifacts?父母如何回应孩子关于人工制品身份的问题?
Dev Sci. 2005 Nov;8(6):519-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00443.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Bigram semantic distance as an index of continuous semantic flow in natural language: Theory, tools, and applications.双词语义距离作为自然语言中连续语义流的指标:理论、工具和应用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Sep;152(9):2578-2590. doi: 10.1037/xge0001389. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Reading comprehension in children with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患儿的阅读理解能力
Read Writ. 2016;29:21-45. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9578-8. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
3
Inborn and experience-dependent models of categorical brain organization. A position paper.先天性和经验依赖性的类别化大脑组织模型。立场文件。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 23;9:2. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00002. eCollection 2015.
4
Separating lexical-semantic access from other mnemonic processes in picture-name verification.在图片命名验证中,将词汇语义访问与其他记忆过程分开。
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 11;4:706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00706. eCollection 2013.
5
Using ratings to gain insight into conceptual development.利用评分来深入了解概念发展。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Oct;56(5):1650-61. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/11-0317). Epub 2013 Jul 9.
6
Object and action naming in children with specific language impairment.特定语言障碍儿童的物体和动作命名。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Dec;53(6):1704-19. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0180). Epub 2010 Aug 12.
7
Coding of visual object features and feature conjunctions in the human brain.人类大脑中视觉对象特征及特征联结的编码
PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003781. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
8
Support for hybrid models of the age of acquisition of English nouns.对英语名词习得年龄混合模型的支持。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Dec;14(6):1164-70. doi: 10.3758/bf03193107.
9
Complexities of expressive word learning over time.随着时间推移,表达性词汇学习的复杂性。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2007 Oct;38(4):353-64. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2007/037).