Soose Ryan J, Simons Jeffrey P, Mandell David L
Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Apr;132(4):446-51. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.4.446.
To examine the clinical factors that influence medical decision making in children with oropharyngeal trauma.
Retrospective chart review (spanning 6 years).
Tertiary care children's hospital.
One hundred seven consecutive children with traumatic oropharyngeal injuries.
Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) (n = 52), surgical therapy (n = 16), inpatient admission (n = 44), and antibiotic administration (n = 77).
The likelihood of a patient undergoing each of the 4 interventions and having positive radiographic findings or clinical complications was assessed with respect to the following clinical factors: (1) age, (2) sex, (3) mechanism of injury, (4) site of injury, (5) wound severity (3-point scale), and (6) otolaryngology consultation.
The following factors were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of a patient undergoing CTA to rule out occult internal carotid artery damage: (1) injury to the lateral soft palate, (2) high wound severity score, and (3) otolaryngology consultation. Radiographic abnormalities (including free air, parapharyngeal edema, and hematoma) were present in 16 (31%) of 52 CTAs but were not associated with any specific clinical factors. Patients with more severe wounds were more likely to undergo CTA, go to the operating room, receive antibiotics, and be admitted to the hospital but were not more likely to have positive CTA findings or an adverse clinical outcome.
We were unable to identify any clinical factors that would help predict which children with oropharyngeal trauma are at high risk of developing neurologic sequelae. Radiographic screening for vascular injury in children with oropharyngeal trauma remains controversial.
探讨影响口咽创伤患儿医疗决策的临床因素。
回顾性病历审查(跨度6年)。
三级医疗儿童医院。
107例连续性口咽创伤患儿。
计算机断层血管造影(CTA)(n = 52)、手术治疗(n = 16)、住院治疗(n = 44)和抗生素使用(n = 77)。
根据以下临床因素评估患者接受4种干预措施中每一种以及有阳性影像学结果或临床并发症的可能性:(1)年龄,(2)性别,(3)损伤机制,(4)损伤部位,(5)伤口严重程度(3分制),以及(6)耳鼻喉科会诊。
以下因素与患者接受CTA以排除隐匿性颈内动脉损伤的可能性增加显著相关:(1)软腭外侧损伤,(2)高伤口严重程度评分,以及(3)耳鼻喉科会诊。52例CTA中有16例(31%)存在影像学异常(包括游离气体、咽旁水肿和血肿),但与任何特定临床因素均无关联。伤口更严重的患者更有可能接受CTA、进入手术室、接受抗生素治疗并住院,但CTA检查结果为阳性或出现不良临床结局的可能性并未增加。
我们无法确定任何有助于预测哪些口咽创伤患儿有发生神经后遗症高风险的临床因素。对口咽创伤患儿进行血管损伤的影像学筛查仍存在争议。