Gjerberg Elisabeth, Sørensen Bjørg Aase
Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet, Postboks 6954 St. Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Apr 6;126(8):1063-6.
The Norwegian parliament's decision to establish unified management on all hospitals units was accompanied by strong public debate. The arguments focused especially on the decision that other than doctors could fill the top managerial position at the department level. We have studied the selection of managers, the prevalence and content of disagreements and conflicts, and how the departments handled the conflicts.
We have used three data sets: a survey of the top managements at all hospitals, interviews with 28 managers, and a survey of a sample of managers at the department level.
In 2004, about 67% of the managers were doctors, 28% were nurses and 5% had other professional backgrounds. Managers educated as nurses were most prevalent in psychiatric wards and in emergency medicine. About half of the hospitals and departments had experienced conflicts when implementing the reform. Confusion about medical responsibility and resistance towards the manager not being a doctor seemed to be most common. With some exception, the conflicts have calmed down, probably because of some clarification from the Ministry of Health about the managers' medical responsibility; also, departments with managers who not are doctors have established a division of labour that satisfy the doctors in the department.
挪威议会决定对所有医院单位实行统一管理,这引发了激烈的公众辩论。争论尤其集中在非医生人员可担任科室高层管理职位这一决定上。我们研究了管理人员的选拔、分歧与冲突的发生率及内容,以及各科室如何处理这些冲突。
我们使用了三个数据集:对所有医院高层管理人员的调查、对28名管理人员的访谈,以及对科室层面部分管理人员的抽样调查。
2004年,约67%的管理人员为医生,28%为护士,5%具有其他专业背景。接受护士教育的管理人员在精神科病房和急诊医学领域最为普遍。约一半的医院和科室在实施改革时经历过冲突。对医疗责任的困惑以及对非医生管理人员的抵制似乎最为常见。除了一些例外情况,冲突已趋于平息,这可能是因为卫生部对管理人员的医疗责任做出了一些澄清;此外,由非医生担任管理人员的科室已经建立了一种分工方式,使科室中的医生感到满意。