Mo Tone Opdahl
SINTEF Health Research, Trondheim, Norway.
J Health Organ Manag. 2008;22(4):400-15. doi: 10.1108/14777260810893980.
The paper seeks to explore whether the development in department management in Norwegian hospitals after the unitary management reform in 2001 constitutes a development in the direction of general management.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Interviews were conducted with ten managers from different levels in a large Norwegian university hospital in 2001-2002, as a unitary management model was implemented.
There is an emerging change of practice among the physician managers according to this study. The manager function is more explicit and takes a more general responsibility for the department and the professions. However, the managerial function is substantiated by conditions related to the professional field of knowledge, which gives legitimacy within a medical logic. Contact with the clinic is stressed as important, but it is possible to adjust both amount and content of a clinical engagement to the demands of the new manager position. This has both a symbolic and a practical significance, as it involves both legitimacy and identity issues.
The paper shows that the institutionalised medical understanding of management has a bearing on managerial reforms. Managerial changes need to relate to this if they are to have consequences for the managerial roles and structures on department level in hospitals.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper suggests that the future development of this role will depend on the way the collectivist and individualist aspects of responsibility are handled, as well as on the further development of managerial knowledge of physicians.
本文旨在探讨2001年挪威医院实行统一管理改革后,部门管理的发展是否朝着综合管理的方向发展。
设计/方法/途径:2001 - 2002年,在一家大型挪威大学医院对来自不同层级的十位管理人员进行了访谈,当时正在实施统一管理模式。
根据本研究,医师管理人员的实践正在发生变化。管理职能更加明确,对部门和专业承担更广泛的责任。然而,管理职能由与专业知识领域相关的条件来证实,这在医学逻辑中赋予了合法性。强调与临床的联系很重要,但可以根据新管理职位的要求调整临床工作的数量和内容。这具有象征意义和实际意义,因为它涉及合法性和身份问题。
本文表明,制度化的医学管理理解对管理改革有影响。如果管理变革要对医院部门层面的管理角色和结构产生影响,就需要考虑到这一点。
原创性/价值:本文表明,这一角色的未来发展将取决于如何处理集体主义和个人主义的责任方面,以及医师管理知识的进一步发展。