与细胞学能力验证法规相关的科学问题。
Scientific issues related to the cytology proficiency testing regulations.
作者信息
Birdsong George, Howell Lydia, Atkison Karen, Austin R Marshall, Bibbo Marluce, Bonfiglio Thomas A, Davey Diane D, Keebler Catherine, Mody Dina, Savaloja Lynnette, Papillo Jacalyn, Prey Marianne, Raab Stephen, Schultz Brenda L, Solomon Diane
机构信息
Grady Health System, 80 Jessie Hill Junior Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
出版信息
Cytojournal. 2006 Apr 18;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-3-11.
Abstract
The member organizations of the Cytology Education and Technology Consortium believe there are significant flaws in current cytology proficiency testing regulations. The most immediate needed modifications include lengthening the required testing interval, utilizing stringently validated and continuously monitored slides, changing the grading scheme, and changing the focus of the test from the individual to laboratory level testing. Integration of new computer-assisted and located-guided screening technologies into the testing protocols is necessary for the testing protocol to be compliant with the law.
摘要
细胞学教育与技术联盟的成员组织认为，当前的细胞学能力验证规定存在重大缺陷。最迫切需要的修改包括延长所需的测试间隔、使用经过严格验证和持续监测的玻片、改变评分方案，以及将测试重点从个人层面测试转变为实验室层面测试。将新的计算机辅助和定位引导筛查技术整合到测试方案中，对于使测试方案符合法律规定是必要的。
相似文献
1
Scientific issues related to the cytology proficiency testing regulations.与细胞学能力验证法规相关的科学问题。
Cytojournal. 2006 Apr 18;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-3-11.
2
Scientific issues related to the cytology proficiency testing regulations.与细胞学能力验证法规相关的科学问题。
Acta Cytol. 2006 Mar-Apr;50(2):191-7. doi: 10.1159/000325930.
3
Computerized training and proficiency testing. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.计算机化培训与能力测试。国际细胞学会工作组总结。《迈向21世纪的诊断细胞学：一次国际专家会议与教程》
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):141-7. doi: 10.1159/000331539.
4
[Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].[卫生技术评估报告：用于宫颈癌筛查的计算机辅助巴氏试验]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43.
5
The impact of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 on cytopathology practice: a 25th anniversary review.1988年《临床实验室改进修正案》对细胞病理学实践的影响：二十五周年回顾
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2014 Jul-Aug;3(4):188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
6
[Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].[卫生技术评估报告：基于人乳头瘤病毒DNA的宫颈癌前病变初筛]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 May-Aug;36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72.
7
Comparison of cytology proficiency testing: glass slides vs. virtual slides.细胞学能力验证比较：载玻片与虚拟玻片
Acta Cytol. 2004 Nov-Dec;48(6):788-94. doi: 10.1159/000326447.
8
Gynecologic cytology proficiency testing failures: what have we learned?: observations from the college of american pathologists gynecologic cytology proficiency testing program.妇科细胞学能力验证失败：我们从中吸取了哪些教训？——美国病理学家学院妇科细胞学能力验证计划的观察结果。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Nov;135(11):1442-6. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2010-0681-SA.
9
Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.法医学事务。国际细胞学会特别工作组总结。《迈向21世纪的诊断细胞学：一次国际专家会议及教程》
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. doi: 10.1159/000331537.
10
The role of proficiency testing in ensuring quality: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.能力验证在保证质量中的作用：美国病理学家学会妇科细胞病理学质量共识会议工作组 3 的研究结果。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Feb;137(2):183-9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0094-OA.
引用本文的文献
1
CytoJournal's move to the new platform: More on financial model to the support open-access charter in cytopathology, publication quality indicators, and other issues.《细胞病理学杂志》迁至新平台：更多关于支持细胞病理学开放获取宪章的财务模式、出版质量指标及其他问题。
Cytojournal. 2008 Dec 16;5:15. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.44572.
2
The Best in CytoJournal: 2006.《细胞杂志》2006年最佳内容
Cytojournal. 2007 Jun 11;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-4-12.
本文引用的文献
1
Robustness of validation criteria in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.美国病理学家学会宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划中验证标准的稳健性
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Aug;130(8):1119-22. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-1119-ROVCIT.
2
Measuring the significance of field validation in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology: how good are the experts?
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 May;129(5):609-13. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-0609-MTSOFV.
3
Second edition of 'The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology' - atlas, website, and Bethesda interobserver reproducibility project.《贝塞斯达宫颈细胞学报告系统》第二版——图谱、网站及贝塞斯达观察者间可重复性项目
Cytojournal. 2004 Oct 21;1(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-1-4.
4
Interim guidance for the use of human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening.人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测作为子宫颈细胞学筛查辅助手段的临时指南。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;103(2):304-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000109426.82624.f8.
5
Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study.高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测呈阳性女性的管理：HART研究
Lancet. 2003 Dec 6;362(9399):1871-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14955-0.
6
Precision in gynecologic cytologic interpretation: a study from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.妇科细胞学诊断的精准度：来自美国病理学家学会宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划的一项研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Nov;127(11):1413-20. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-1413-PIGCIA.
7
Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.前瞻性随访表明，宫颈上皮内瘤变1级或阴道镜检查及定向活检阴性的女性发生后续宫颈上皮内瘤变2级或3级的风险相似。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;188(6):1406-12. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.461.
8
Postcolposcopy management strategies for women referred with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a two-year prospective study.针对低级别鳞状上皮内病变或人乳头瘤病毒DNA阳性意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞转诊的女性进行的阴道镜检查后管理策略：一项为期两年的前瞻性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;188(6):1401-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.456.
9
2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities.2001年宫颈细胞学异常女性管理共识指南。
JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2120-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2120.
10
The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.2001年贝塞斯达系统：宫颈细胞学检查结果报告术语
JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2114-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2114.
Zotero 插件