Davidoff Jules
Centre for Cognition, Computation, and Culture, Goldsmiths, University of London, London SE14 6NW, UK.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Aug;94(4):334-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
In their lead articles, both Kowalski and Zimiles (2006) and O'Hanlon and Roberson (2006) declare a general relation between color term knowledge and the ability to conceptually represent color. Kowalski and Zimiles, in particular, argue for a priority for the conceptual representation in color term acquisition. The complexities of the interaction are taken up in the current commentary, especially with regard to the neuropsychological evidence. Data from aphasic patients also argue for a priority for abstract thought, but nevertheless it may still be that the use of color terms is the only way in which to form color categories even if both linguistic and attentional factors play an important role.
在其主要文章中，科瓦尔斯基和齐米莱斯（2006年）以及奥汉隆和罗伯逊（2006年）都宣称颜色术语知识与概念性表征颜色的能力之间存在普遍关系。特别是科瓦尔斯基和齐米莱斯主张在颜色术语习得中概念性表征具有优先性。当前的评论探讨了这种相互作用的复杂性，尤其是关于神经心理学证据方面。失语症患者的数据也支持抽象思维具有优先性，但即便语言和注意力因素都发挥着重要作用，使用颜色术语可能仍然是形成颜色类别的唯一途径。
