Williamson Ann
NSW Injury Risk Management Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Building G2, Western Campus, UNSW Sydney 2052, Australia.
Neurotoxicology. 2007 Mar;28(2):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.03.009. Epub 2006 Mar 22.
Questionnaires are one of the most common methodologies used in research on neurobehavioural effects in occupational and environmental health, most commonly for gathering information on demographic characteristics, psychological or neurological symptoms, mood state, or exposure to hazards. Questionnaires are self-report measures, so by definition are subjective, although their degree of subjectivity depends on the phenomenon they are measuring. For some phenomena questionnaires are used because they are convenient but the information can be obtained from other sources. For other phenomena questionnaire or self-report is the only way of obtaining the information, for example, feelings and experiences, mood or emotions. Questionnaires are essential tools in psychological and neurobehavioural research as they can tap into aspects of nervous system function that cannot be readily measured in other ways. Despite the obvious need for self-report measures, there are a number of serious issues that threaten their validity as effective indicators of neurobehavioural function. This paper considers the implications of some of the major problems with self-report measures, focusing particularly on current approaches to measurement of symptoms and mood. It includes issues relating to validity of measures such as demand characteristics, malingering and under or over reporting, individual differences and problems of language and question style. It also includes issues relating to the interpretation of self-report measures, the relationship between self-report and performance measures, whether they reflect primary or secondary effects and whether they can be used as diagnostic criteria for neurobehavioural functional effects of occupational or environmental exposure. The paper looks at some of the current approaches to overcoming these problems including using interviews and observational methods and improving psychometric qualities of these measures. Self-report measures are important tools in our arsenal of measures of the neurobehavioural effects of occupational and environmental exposure, but they need to be used with care.
问卷调查是职业与环境卫生领域神经行为效应研究中最常用的方法之一,最常用于收集人口统计学特征、心理或神经症状、情绪状态或接触危害因素等方面的信息。问卷调查是自我报告式的测量方法,因此从定义上讲是主观的,尽管其主观程度取决于所测量的现象。对于某些现象,使用问卷调查是因为其方便,但这些信息也可以从其他来源获得。对于其他现象,问卷调查或自我报告是获取信息的唯一途径,例如感受和经历、情绪或情感。问卷调查是心理学和神经行为研究中的重要工具,因为它们能够挖掘神经系统功能中无法通过其他方式轻易测量的方面。尽管显然需要自我报告式的测量方法,但仍存在一些严重问题,威胁到它们作为神经行为功能有效指标的有效性。本文探讨了自我报告式测量方法中一些主要问题的影响,特别关注当前症状和情绪测量方法。这包括与测量有效性相关的问题,如需求特征、装病以及报告不足或过度、个体差异以及语言和问题风格问题。还包括与自我报告式测量解释相关的问题、自我报告与绩效测量之间的关系、它们是否反映主要或次要影响以及它们是否可作为职业或环境暴露神经行为功能影响的诊断标准。本文审视了一些当前克服这些问题的方法,包括使用访谈和观察方法以及提高这些测量方法的心理测量质量。自我报告式测量方法是我们测量职业和环境暴露神经行为效应工具库中的重要工具,但需要谨慎使用。