Shahid H, Hossain P, Amoaku W M
Prince Charles Eye Unit, King Edward VII Hospital, Windsor, UK.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 May;90(5):627-39. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.068668.
Retinal vein occlusions (RVO) are the second commonest sight threatening vascular disorder. Despite its frequency treatments for RVO are unsatisfactory and include several that have not been tested by large, well designed, prospective, randomised controlled trials. There is also the lack of long term follow up in many of the available small uncontrolled studies, and the timings of interventions are haphazard. This review aims to evaluate the current knowledge relating to the pathogenesis, suggested treatments for the different types of RVO, and their complications. Isovolaemic haemodilution is of limited benefit and should be avoided in patients with concurrent cardiovascular, renal, or pulmonary morbidity. Evidence to date does not support any therapeutic benefit from radial optic neurotomy, optic nerve decompression, or arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy on its own. Vitrectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis may offer promise for central RVO. Similarly, vitrectomy combined with arteriovenous sheathotomy intravenous tissue plasminogen activator may offer benefits for branch RVO. RVOs occur at significantly high frequency to allow future prospective randomised controlled studies to be conducted to evaluate the role of different therapeutic modalities singly or in combination.
视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)是第二常见的威胁视力的血管疾病。尽管其发病率很高,但RVO的治疗效果并不理想,包括一些未经大型、设计良好、前瞻性、随机对照试验验证的治疗方法。在许多现有的小型非对照研究中,也缺乏长期随访,且干预时机随意。本综述旨在评估目前有关RVO发病机制、不同类型RVO的建议治疗方法及其并发症的知识。等容血液稀释的益处有限,并发心血管、肾脏或肺部疾病的患者应避免使用。迄今为止的证据不支持单纯进行放射状视神经切开术、视神经减压术或动静脉交叉鞘切开术有任何治疗益处。玻璃体切除术联合静脉溶栓可能为中央型RVO带来希望。同样,玻璃体切除术联合动静脉鞘切开术及静脉注射组织纤溶酶原激活剂可能对分支型RVO有益。RVO的发病率相当高,这使得未来能够开展前瞻性随机对照研究,以评估不同治疗方式单独或联合应用的作用。