• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Autonomy and audit--striking the balance.

作者信息

Hagger Lynn, Woods Simon, Barrow Paul

机构信息

University of Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Med Law Int. 2004;6(2):105-16. doi: 10.1177/096853320400600203.

DOI:10.1177/096853320400600203
PMID:16622965
Abstract

The Data Protection Act 1998 purports to implement European legislation which aims to protect the privacy of individuals. There were such concerns about the implications of the Act for certain research and audit that it became necessary to enact further legislation to enable such essential activities to continue. Although this empowers the Secretary of State for Health to approve proposals for these purposes, there should still be a requirement that the use of identifiable personal information without consent must be justified on compelling public interest grounds. It is this that can confound those seeking to rely on such justification. There can either be too cavalier an approach to the issue, and/or there is little sense of what considerations should come into play. This paper attempts to highlight some of the difficulties that are theoretically raised by some audit activities and set out the legal framework within which they must operate. However, the key focus is on how ethical considerations might inform the public interest argument.

摘要

相似文献

1
Autonomy and audit--striking the balance.
Med Law Int. 2004;6(2):105-16. doi: 10.1177/096853320400600203.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Consent and confidentiality in occupational health practice: balance between legal requirements and ethical values].[职业健康实践中的同意与保密:法律要求与道德价值之间的平衡]
Med Lav. 2010 May-Jun;101(3):163-8.
4
Law, ethics and epidemiology: the case of the cervical screening audit.法律、伦理与流行病学:宫颈筛查审计案例
N Z Bioeth J. 2001 Jun;2(2):8-26.
5
The Patient Information Advisory Group and the use of patient-identifiable data.患者信息咨询小组与可识别患者的数据的使用。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jul;8 Suppl 1:S1:8-11. doi: 10.1258/135581903766468819.
6
Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks.人类生物样本库使用的伦理和法律框架趋势。
Eur Respir J. 2007 Aug;30(2):373-82. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00165006.
7
Low risk research using routinely collected identifiable health information without informed consent: encounters with the Patient Information Advisory Group.在未获得知情同意的情况下使用常规收集的可识别健康信息进行的低风险研究:与患者信息咨询小组的接触
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jan;34(1):37-40. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019661.
8
Rights involve responsibilities for patients. Doctors must not generally pass personal information about patients to others without consent.权利意味着患者要承担相应责任。一般情况下,未经患者同意,医生不得将患者的个人信息透露给他人。
BMJ. 2001 Jul 14;323(7304):108.
9
Privacy and confidentiality in pragmatic clinical trials.实用临床试验中的隐私与保密
Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):520-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597677. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
10
Issues of consent and privacy affecting the functioning of ASERNIP-S.
ANZ J Surg. 2002 Aug;72(8):580-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02477.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics of collecting and using healthcare data.医疗保健数据收集与使用的伦理问题。
BMJ. 2007 Jun 30;334(7608):1330-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39247.679329.80.