Aliprandi A, Fausto A, Quarenghi M, Modestino S, Randelli P, Sardanelli F
Servizio di Radiologia, Policlinico San Donato, Università di Milano, Via Morandi 30, I-20097 San Donato Milanese (MI), Italy.
Radiol Med. 2006 Feb;111(1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0006-7.
Our aim was to perform computed tomography arthrography (CTA) and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the shoulder as a one-shot examination and to evaluate its value on the basis of arthroscopy as a gold standard.
Fifteen men and 16 women with planned arthroscopy for chronic (n=17) or traumatic tear of the rotator cuff (n=8), congenital atraumatic (n=1) or traumatic glenohumeral instability (n=2), traumatic tear of the rotator cuff with glenohumeral instability (n=1), or "frozen shoulder" (n=2) underwent plain helical CT in neutral position and intra-articular CT-guided injection of a mixture of iodinated and paramagnetic contrast agents (gadodiamide at 1:250 and iobitridol 350 at 1:5 in 20 ml of saline solution). CT helical scans in intra- and extrarotation and T1-weighted MRA scans in the neutral position were obtained. CTA and MRA were evaluated separately and jointly (CTA-MRA) in different blinded sessions, giving a 0-3 score to the agreement of CTA, MRA, and CTA-MRA with arthroscopy.
The injected volume of the solution ranged from 10 to 24 ml. No side effects were observed. CTA obtained a score of 2.33+/-0.62, MRA 2.47+/-0.52, and CTA-MRA 2.67+/-0.49. Significant differences were found for CTA-MRA versus CTA (p=0.0281) and MRA (p=0.0277). There was no significant difference for CTA versus MRA.
CTA and MRA can be performed as a one-shot exam. CTA-MRA seems to give more information than CTA or MRA separately.
我们的目的是将肩部计算机断层扫描关节造影(CTA)和磁共振关节造影(MRA)作为一次性检查进行,并以关节镜检查作为金标准评估其价值。
15名男性和16名女性计划接受关节镜检查,病因包括慢性(n = 17)或创伤性肩袖撕裂(n = 8)、先天性非创伤性(n = 1)或创伤性盂肱关节不稳(n = 2)、伴有盂肱关节不稳的创伤性肩袖撕裂(n = 1)或“肩周炎”(n = 2)。患者在中立位接受平扫螺旋CT检查,并在关节内CT引导下注射碘化造影剂和顺磁性造影剂的混合物(钆双胺按1:250、碘比醇350按1:5加入20 ml盐溶液中)。获得内旋和外旋时的CT螺旋扫描图像以及中立位的T1加权MRA扫描图像。在不同的盲法环节分别对CTA和MRA进行评估,并联合评估(CTA - MRA),根据CTA、MRA和CTA - MRA与关节镜检查结果的一致性给予0 - 3分。
溶液注射量为10至24 ml。未观察到副作用。CTA评分为2.33±0.62,MRA评分为2.47±0.52,CTA - MRA评分为2.67±0.49。CTA - MRA与CTA(p = 0.0281)和MRA(p = 0.0277)相比存在显著差异。CTA与MRA之间无显著差异。
CTA和MRA可以作为一次性检查进行。CTA - MRA似乎比单独的CTA或MRA能提供更多信息。