• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNAC)结果未明确诊断的可疑乳腺病变进行血管超声检查:与能量多普勒超声的比较

Angiosonography in suspicious breast lesions with non-diagnostic FNAC: comparison with power Doppler US.

作者信息

Caumo F, Carbognin G, Casarin A, Pinali L, Vasori S, D'Onofrio M, Pozzi Mucelli R

机构信息

Sezione di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologico-Biomediche, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico G.B. Rossi, P.le L.A. Scuro 10,1-37134 Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Radiol Med. 2006 Feb;111(1):61-72. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0007-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11547-006-0007-6
PMID:16623306
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of angiosonography in comparison with colour Doppler ultrasound (US) in the discrimination of suspicious breast lesions with nondiagnostic fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre-operative Power Doppler US and angiosonography were prospectively performed in 20 suspicious breast lesions with non-diagnostic FNAC. A second-generation US contrast agent was utilised with a high-frequency transducer and a contrast-specific algorithm (low acoustic pressure CnTI). The enhancement characteristics of all lesions were analysed using qualitative and quantitative parameters obtained from time-intensity curves with the different imaging modalities. The final diagnosis was confirmed at pathology in all cases. Microvessel density (MVD) was assessed in the surgical specimen using CD34.

RESULTS

The correct assessment of biological behaviour was achieved in all cases by angiosonography (sensitivity of 100%; specificity of 91%) and colour Doppler US (45% sensitivity; 78% specificity). MVD correlated with the biological behaviour.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiosonography is more accurate than colour Doppler US in the correct assessment of biological behaviour of suspicious breast lesions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估血管超声相对于彩色多普勒超声(US)在鉴别细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)结果不明确的可疑乳腺病变方面的准确性。

材料与方法

对20例FNAC结果不明确的可疑乳腺病变患者进行前瞻性术前能量多普勒超声和血管超声检查。使用第二代超声造影剂、高频探头及特定的造影算法(低声压CnTI)。利用不同成像模式从时间强度曲线获得的定性和定量参数分析所有病变的增强特征。所有病例均经病理确诊。使用CD34评估手术标本中的微血管密度(MVD)。

结果

血管超声对所有病例生物学行为的正确评估率为(敏感性100%;特异性91%),彩色多普勒超声为(敏感性45%;特异性78%)。MVD与生物学行为相关。

结论

在正确评估可疑乳腺病变的生物学行为方面,血管超声比彩色多普勒超声更准确。

相似文献

1
Angiosonography in suspicious breast lesions with non-diagnostic FNAC: comparison with power Doppler US.对细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNAC)结果未明确诊断的可疑乳腺病变进行血管超声检查:与能量多普勒超声的比较
Radiol Med. 2006 Feb;111(1):61-72. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0007-6.
2
Axillary Staging of Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer by Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: Which Ultrasound Criteria for Classifying Abnormal Lymph Nodes Should Be Adopted in the Post-ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Era?超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查对早期浸润性乳腺癌进行腋窝分期:在ACOSOG Z0011试验后时代,应采用哪些超声标准来对异常淋巴结进行分类?
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 May;35(5):885-93. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.06019. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
3
The utility of ultrasound superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of breast tumour vascularity: comparison with colour and power Doppler imaging regarding diagnostic performance.超声超微血管成像在评估乳腺肿瘤血管方面的应用:与彩色多普勒成像和能量多普勒成像诊断性能的比较
Clin Radiol. 2018 Mar;73(3):304-311. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
4
Accuracy of needle biopsy of breast lesions visible on ultrasound: audit of fine needle versus core needle biopsy in 3233 consecutive samplings with ascertained outcomes.超声可见乳腺病变的针吸活检准确性:3233 例连续取样证实结果的细针与芯针活检比较的审核。
Breast. 2012 Aug;21(4):449-54. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
5
A comparision of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy according to tumor size of suspicious breast lesions.根据可疑乳腺病变的肿瘤大小对细针穿刺细胞学检查和粗针穿刺活检进行比较。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2008 Jan;36(1):26-31. doi: 10.1002/dc.20748.
6
A sensitivity and specificity comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in evaluation of suspicious breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.细针穿刺细胞学检查与粗针穿刺活检在评估可疑乳腺病变中的敏感性和特异性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
7
A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.在评估可触及及乳腺钼靶检查发现的可疑乳腺病变中,粗针活检与细针穿刺细胞学检查的对比分析。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2007 Nov;35(11):681-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.20721.
8
[Analysis of vascularity in breast tumors--comparison of high frequency ultrasound and contrast-enhanced color harmonic imaging].[乳腺肿瘤血管情况分析——高频超声与对比增强彩色谐波成像的比较]
Rofo. 2002 Sep;174(9):1132-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33940.
9
Correlation between color power Doppler sonographic measurement of breast tumor vasculature and immunohistochemical analysis of microvessel density for the quantitation of angiogenesis.乳腺肿瘤血管系统的彩色能量多普勒超声测量与微血管密度免疫组化分析在血管生成定量方面的相关性。
J Ultrasound Med. 2002 Nov;21(11):1227-35. doi: 10.7863/jum.2002.21.11.1227.
10
Effects of a microbubble contrast agent on breast tumors: computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US--early experience.微泡造影剂对乳腺肿瘤的影响:彩色多普勒超声计算机辅助定量评估——早期经验
Radiology. 1998 Aug;208(2):485-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.2.9680580.

引用本文的文献

1
The application of multimodal ultrasound examination in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS category 4.多模态超声检查在BI-RADS 4类乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的应用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 9;12:1596100. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1596100. eCollection 2025.
2
CEUS helps to rerate small breast tumors of BI-RADS category 3 and category 4.超声造影有助于重新评估BI-RADS 3类和4类的小乳腺肿瘤。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:572532. doi: 10.1155/2014/572532. Epub 2014 May 25.
3
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI.
超声造影在乳腺肿块性质鉴别中的应用:与 MRI 的定量分析比较。
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):1384-95. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1690-1. Epub 2009 Dec 22.