• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生抄袭与专业实践。

Student plagiarism and professional practice.

作者信息

Kenny Deborah

机构信息

Department of Midwifery Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jan;27(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2006.02.004
PMID:16624455
Abstract

With the ever-increasing availability and accessibility of the Internet, students are able to access a multitude of resources in support of their studies. However, this has also led to an increase in their ability to cheat through plagiarising text and claiming it as their own. Increased pressures of balancing work and study have contributed to this rise. Not only confined to the student population, some academics are also guilty of engaging in this practice providing a less than favourable role model for their students. Of increasing concern is the links of this practice to professionalism or indeed in this case unprofessionalism. Both pre- and post-registration nursing students who plagiarise risk bringing the reputation of the profession into disrepute. There are a number of methods that may be used to detect plagiarism but often the penalties are menial and inconsistently applied. Overall it is essential that academic institutions foster a culture of honesty and integrity amongst its academic community. A culture that clearly emphasises that plagiarism in any form is unacceptable.

摘要

随着互联网的普及程度和可及性不断提高,学生能够获取大量资源来支持他们的学习。然而,这也导致他们通过抄袭文本并据为己有来作弊的能力有所增强。工作与学习平衡压力的增加促成了这种现象的增多。这种行为不仅限于学生群体,一些学者也有参与其中的情况,为学生树立了不太正面的榜样。越来越令人担忧的是这种行为与专业精神的关联,或者在这种情况下是与非专业精神的关联。无论是注册前还是注册后的护理专业学生,抄袭都有可能使该职业声誉受损。有多种方法可用于检测抄袭行为,但处罚往往轻微且执行不一致。总体而言,学术机构必须在其学术社群中培育诚实和正直的文化。一种明确强调任何形式的抄袭都是不可接受的文化。

相似文献

1
Student plagiarism and professional practice.学生抄袭与专业实践。
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jan;27(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
2
Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: an empirical investigation.护理学校的学术不端行为:一项实证研究。
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Nov;48(11):614-23. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090716-07. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
3
Academic dishonesty and professional practice: a convocation.学术不诚实与专业实践:一场毕业典礼演讲
Nurse Educ. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):270-1. doi: 10.1097/00006223-200011000-00009.
4
Using an ethical decision-making model to determine consequences for student plagiarism.
J Nurs Educ. 2006 Jun;45(6):199-203. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20060601-03.
5
The process of becoming: from specialty practice to community-based nursing.成长历程:从专科实践到社区护理
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 2004 Summer;8(4):146-9.
6
Emotional competence and nursing education: a New Zealand study.情感能力与护理教育:一项新西兰的研究。
Nurs Prax N Z. 2008 Mar;24(1):36-47.
7
Professional roles and communications in clinical placements: a qualitative study of nursing students' perceptions and some models for practice.临床实习中的专业角色与沟通:一项关于护生认知及一些实践模式的定性研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Sep;43(7):861-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.008. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
8
What does an innovative teaching assignment strategy mean to nursing students?创新教学任务策略对护生意味着什么?
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 May-Jun;30(3):159-63.
9
Nursing students and teaching of codes of ethics: an empirical research study.护理专业学生与伦理学规范教学:一项实证研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Dec;56(4):483-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00748.x.
10
Academe under siege.学术界受到围攻。
Nurs Outlook. 2006 May-Jun;54(3):117-9. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2006.04.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of plagiarism among undergraduate medical students in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第本科医学生对剽窃行为的认知
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Mar-Apr;35(2):532-536. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.2.33.
2
Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism.专家们对抄袭案例的经验。
J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Jul 31;2:32. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.115817. eCollection 2013.
3
Competing duties: medical educators, underperforming students, and social accountability.竞争职责:医学教育者、表现不佳的学生和社会责任。
J Bioeth Inq. 2012 Jun;9(2):135-47. doi: 10.1007/s11673-012-9365-z. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
Is there an effective approach to deterring students from plagiarizing?有没有一种有效的方法来阻止学生抄袭?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2008 Mar;14(1):139-47. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9037-2. Epub 2007 Nov 8.