Behrman Michael, Linder Roland, Assadi Amir H, Stacey Brett R, Backonja Misha-Miroslav
Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin--Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Eur J Pain. 2007 May;11(4):370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
Wider use of pain assessment tools that are specifically designed for certain types of pain--such as neuropathic pain--contribute an increasing amount of information which in turn offers the opportunity to employ advanced methods of data analysis. In this manuscript, we present the results of a study where we employed artificial neural networks (ANNs) in an analysis of pain descriptors with the goal of determining how an approach that uses a specific symptoms-based tool would perform with data from the real world of clinical practice. We also used traditional statistics approaches in the form of established scoring systems as well as logistic regression analysis for the purpose of comparison. Our results confirm the clinical experience that groups of pain descriptors rather than single items differentiate between patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain. The accuracy obtained by ANN analysis was only slightly higher than that of the traditional approaches, indicating the absence of nonlinear relationships in this dataset. Data analysis with ANNs provides a framework that extends what current approaches offer, especially for dynamic data, such as the rating of pain descriptors over time.
更广泛地使用专门针对某些类型疼痛(如神经性疼痛)设计的疼痛评估工具,能提供越来越多的信息,进而为采用先进的数据分析方法创造机会。在本手稿中,我们展示了一项研究的结果,在该研究中我们运用人工神经网络(ANN)对疼痛描述符进行分析,目的是确定使用特定基于症状的工具的方法在临床实践的实际数据中表现如何。我们还使用了既定评分系统形式的传统统计方法以及逻辑回归分析以作比较。我们的结果证实了临床经验,即疼痛描述符组而非单个项目能区分神经性疼痛和非神经性疼痛患者。ANN分析获得的准确性仅略高于传统方法,表明该数据集中不存在非线性关系。使用ANN进行数据分析提供了一个框架,扩展了当前方法所能提供的内容,特别是对于动态数据,如疼痛描述符随时间的评分。