Lunn M P T, Nobile-Orazio E
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK, WC1N 3BG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD002827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002827.pub2.
Serum monoclonal anti-myelin associated glycoprotein antibodies may be pathogenic in some people with IgM paraprotein and demyelinating neuropathy. Immunotherapies aimed at reducing the level of these antibodies might be expected to be beneficial.
To examine the efficacy of any form of immunotherapy in reducing disability and impairment resulting from IgM anti-myelin associated glycoprotein paraprotein-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy.
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Register (March 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2005) and EMBASE (January 1980 to March 2005) for controlled trials. We also checked bibliographies and contacted authors and experts in the field.
We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of participants of any age treated with any type of immunotherapy for anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of any severity. Our primary outcome measure was change in the Neuropathy Impairment Scale or Modified Rankin Scale at six months after randomisationSecondary outcome measures were: Neuropathy Impairment Scale or the Modified Rankin Score at 12 months after randomisation; ten-metre walk time, subjective clinical scores and electrophysiological parameters at six and 12 months after randomisation; IgM paraprotein levels and anti-myelin associated glycoprotein antibody titres at six months after randomisation and adverse effects of treatments.
We identified eight possible trials. Of these, five randomised controlled trials were included after discussion between the authors. One author extracted and the other checked the data. No missing data could be obtained from trial authors.
The five eligible trials (97 participants) tested intravenous immunoglobulin, interferon-alpha or plasma exchange. Only two, of intravenous immunoglobulin, had comparable interventions and outcomes but both were short-term. There were no significant benefits of the treatments used in the outcomes predefined for this review, but not all the predefined outcomes were used in every included trial. Intravenous immunoglobulin showed benefits in terms of improvement in Modified Rankin Scale at two weeks and 10-metre walk time at four weeks. Serious adverse effects of intravenous immunoglobulin are known to occur from observational studies but none were encountered in these trials.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is inadequate reliable evidence from trials of immunotherapies in anti-myelin associated glycoprotein paraproteinaemic neuropathy to recommend any particular immunotherapy treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin is relatively safe and may produce some short-term benefit. Large well-designed randomised trials of at least six to 12 months duration are required to assess existing or novel therapies.
血清单克隆抗髓鞘相关糖蛋白抗体可能在一些伴有IgM副蛋白血症和脱髓鞘性神经病的患者中具有致病性。旨在降低这些抗体水平的免疫疗法可能会带来益处。
研究任何形式的免疫疗法在减轻IgM抗髓鞘相关糖蛋白副蛋白血症相关性脱髓鞘性周围神经病所致残疾和损伤方面的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉疾病组注册库(2005年3月)、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2005年3月)和EMBASE(1980年1月至2005年3月)以查找对照试验。我们还查阅了参考文献并联系了该领域的作者和专家。
我们纳入了针对任何年龄的参与者,采用任何类型免疫疗法治疗抗髓鞘相关糖蛋白抗体相关性脱髓鞘性周围神经病合并任何严重程度意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病的随机或半随机对照试验。我们的主要结局指标是随机分组后6个月时神经病变损害量表或改良Rankin量表的变化。次要结局指标包括:随机分组后12个月时的神经病变损害量表或改良Rankin评分;随机分组后6个月和12个月时的10米步行时间、主观临床评分和电生理参数;随机分组后6个月时的IgM副蛋白水平和抗髓鞘相关糖蛋白抗体滴度以及治疗的不良反应。
我们识别出8项可能的试验。其中,经作者讨论后纳入了5项随机对照试验。一位作者提取数据,另一位作者进行核对。无法从试验作者处获取缺失数据。
5项符合条件的试验(97名参与者)测试了静脉注射免疫球蛋白、α干扰素或血浆置换。只有两项关于静脉注射免疫球蛋白的试验具有可比的干预措施和结局,但均为短期试验。在本综述预先定义的结局方面,所使用的治疗方法均未显示出显著益处,但并非每项纳入试验都使用了所有预先定义的结局。静脉注射免疫球蛋白在2周时改良Rankin量表的改善以及4周时10米步行时间方面显示出益处。观察性研究已知静脉注射免疫球蛋白会发生严重不良反应,但这些试验中均未遇到。
抗髓鞘相关糖蛋白副蛋白血症性神经病免疫疗法试验的可靠证据不足,无法推荐任何特定的免疫疗法治疗。静脉注射免疫球蛋白相对安全,可能会产生一些短期益处。需要进行至少6至12个月的大型精心设计的随机试验来评估现有或新型疗法。