Suppr超能文献

准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视的比较。

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.

作者信息

Shortt A J, Allan B D S

机构信息

Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London, UK, EC1V 2PD.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005135.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myopia (also known as short-sightedness or near-sightedness) is an ocular condition in which the refractive power of the eye is greater than is required, resulting in light from distant objects being focused in front of the retina instead of directly on it. The two most commonly used surgical techniques to permanently correct myopia are photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of PRK and LASIK for correction of myopia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2005, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2005), EMBASE (1980 to September 2005) and LILACs (1982 to 3 November 2005). We also searched the reference lists of the studies and the Science Citation Index.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing PRK and LASIK for correction of any degree of myopia. We also included data on adverse events from prospective multicentre consecutive case series in the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) trials database (http//www.fda.gov/cdrh/LASIK/lasers.htm).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Data were summarised using odds ratio and mean difference. Odds ratios were combined using a random-effects model after testing for heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included six randomised controlled trials involving a total of 417 eyes, of which 201 were treated with PRK and 216 with LASIK. We found that although LASIK gives a faster visual recovery than PRK, the effectiveness of these two procedures is comparable. We found some evidence that LASIK may be less likely than PRK to result in loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: LASIK gives a faster visual recovery than PRK but the effectiveness of these two procedures is comparable. Further trials using contemporary techniques are required to determine whether LASIK and PRK are equally safe.

摘要

背景

近视(也称为近视或短视)是一种眼部疾病,其中眼睛的屈光力大于所需值,导致来自远处物体的光线聚焦在视网膜前方而不是直接聚焦在视网膜上。两种最常用的永久性矫正近视的手术技术是准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)和准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)。

目的

本综述的目的是比较PRK和LASIK矫正近视的有效性和安全性。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane图书馆(2005年第3期)中的Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(1966年至2005年9月)、EMBASE(1980年至2005年9月)和LILACS(1982年至2005年11月3日)。我们还检索了研究的参考文献列表和科学引文索引。

选择标准

我们纳入了比较PRK和LASIK矫正任何程度近视的随机对照试验。我们还纳入了食品药品监督管理局(FDA)试验数据库(http//www.fda.gov/cdrh/LASIK/lasers.htm)中前瞻性多中心连续病例系列的不良事件数据。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。数据使用比值比和均值差进行汇总。在检验异质性后,使用随机效应模型合并比值比。

主要结果

本综述纳入了6项随机对照试验,共涉及417只眼睛,其中201只接受了PRK治疗,216只接受了LASIK治疗。我们发现,虽然LASIK比PRK的视力恢复更快,但这两种手术的有效性相当。我们发现一些证据表明,与PRK相比,LASIK导致最佳眼镜矫正视力丧失的可能性可能更小。

作者结论

LASIK比PRK的视力恢复更快,但这两种手术的有效性相当。需要使用当代技术进行进一步试验,以确定LASIK和PRK是否同样安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验