Outhouse T L, Al-Alawi R, Fedorowicz Z, Keenan J V
United States Navy, Dental Corps, Comprehensive Dentistry, Box 25438, Awali, Bahrain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005519.pub2.
Halitosis is used to describe any disagreeable odour of expired air regardless of its origin. Mouthwashes which disguise oral malodor are more socially acceptable and generally more popular than tongue scrapers.
To provide reliable evidence regarding the effectiveness of tongue scraping versus other interventions (including mouthwashes) to control halitosis.
We searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 15th September 2005); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3 2005); MEDLINE 1966 to September Week 1 2005; EMBASE 1974 to September 2005 (searched September 19th 2005).
Randomized controlled trials comparing different methods of tongue cleaning to reduce mouth odour in adults with halitosis.
Clinical heterogeneity between the two included trials precluded pooling of data, therefore a descriptive summary is presented.
This review included two trials involving 40 participants. Both trials were methodologically sound but included no data for the primary outcomes specified in this review. Secondary outcomes expressed as volatile sulfur compound (VSC) levels were assessed by a portable sulfide monitor in both trials. One trial showed reductions of VSC levels of 42% with the tongue cleaner, 40% with the tongue scraper and 33% with the toothbrush. Reduced VSC levels persisted longer with the tongue cleaner than the toothbrush and could not be detected for more than 30 minutes after the intervention in any of the groups. Differences were assessed by the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests with the level of significance set at P < 0.05. The second trial, in which differences in totaled rank values between groups were compared by the Dunn method alpha = 0.01, showed a reduction of VSC levels compared with baseline measurements of 75% with the tongue scraper and 45% with the toothbrush. Adverse effects in one trial were nausea (60%) and trauma (10%) with the toothbrush and all participants receptive to using the tongue scraper. Based on the independent data from these two trials there was a statistically significant difference between the effectiveness of either the tongue cleaner or the tongue scraper in reducing VSC levels when compared with the toothbrush.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is weak and unreliable evidence to show that there is a small but statistically significant difference in reduction of VSC levels when tongue scrapers or cleaners rather than toothbrushes are used to reduce halitosis in adults. We found no high level evidence comparing mechanical with other forms of tongue cleaning.
口臭用于描述呼出气体中任何令人不快的气味,无论其来源如何。掩盖口腔异味的漱口水比舌刷在社会上更易被接受且通常更受欢迎。
提供关于使用舌刷与其他干预措施(包括漱口水)控制口臭效果的可靠证据。
我们检索了以下数据库:Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库(至2005年9月15日);Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》,2005年第3期);MEDLINE 1966年至2005年9月第1周;EMBASE 1974年至2005年9月(2005年9月19日检索)。
比较不同舌清洁方法以减少成年口臭患者口腔异味的随机对照试验。
纳入的两项试验之间的临床异质性妨碍了数据合并,因此给出描述性总结。
本综述纳入两项试验,共40名参与者。两项试验在方法学上均合理,但均未包含本综述指定的主要结局数据。两项试验均通过便携式硫化物监测仪评估以挥发性硫化物(VSC)水平表示的次要结局。一项试验显示,使用舌清洁器时VSC水平降低42%,使用舌刷时降低40%,使用牙刷时降低33%。舌清洁器使VSC水平降低的持续时间比牙刷长,且在任何组干预后30分钟以上均未检测到VSC水平降低。差异通过Friedman检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行评估,显著性水平设定为P<0.05。第二项试验采用Dunn法(α = 0.01)比较组间总秩和值的差异,结果显示与基线测量值相比,使用舌刷时VSC水平降低75%,使用牙刷时降低45%。一项试验中的不良反应为使用牙刷时出现恶心(60%)和创伤(10%),所有参与者均愿意使用舌刷。基于这两项试验的独立数据,与牙刷相比,舌清洁器或舌刷在降低VSC水平的有效性方面存在统计学显著差异。
有薄弱且不可靠的证据表明,在成年口臭患者中,使用舌刷或舌清洁器而非牙刷减少VSC水平存在微小但具有统计学意义的差异。我们未发现将机械舌清洁与其他形式舌清洁进行比较的高级别证据。