Wagener Diane K, Sporer Amy K, Simmerling Mary, Flome Jennifer L, An Christina, Curry Susan J
RTI International, Rockville, MD, USA.
Ethics Behav. 2004;14(4):335-49. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1404_5.
The purpose of this research was to understand institutional review board (IRB) challenges regarding youth-focused research submissions and to present advice from administrators. Semistructured self-report questionnaires were sent via e-mail to administrators identified using published lists of universities and hospitals an Internet searches. Of 183 eligible institutions, 49 responded. One half indicated they never granted parental waivers. Among those considering waivers, decision factors included research risks, survey content, and feasibility. Smoking and substance abuse research among children was generally considered more than minimal risk. These findings are consistent with those from a study conducted by Mammel and Kaplan (1995), which investigated IRB practices concerning protocols involving adolescent participants. IRBs and investigators need to become aware of regulations' flexibility to ensure adequate participant protection. Investigators need to limit jargon and assumptions about participants' understanding of research objectives.
本研究的目的是了解机构审查委员会(IRB)在针对青少年的研究提交方面所面临的挑战,并呈现管理人员的建议。通过电子邮件向使用大学和医院已公布名单以及互联网搜索确定的管理人员发送了半结构化的自我报告问卷。在183个符合条件的机构中,49个做出了回应。其中一半表示他们从未批准过家长豁免。在考虑豁免的机构中,决策因素包括研究风险、调查内容和可行性。儿童吸烟和药物滥用研究通常被认为风险超过最低限度。这些发现与Mammel和Kaplan(1995年)进行的一项研究结果一致,该研究调查了IRB对涉及青少年参与者的方案的审查做法。IRB和研究人员需要意识到法规的灵活性,以确保对参与者的充分保护。研究人员需要限制行话以及对参与者对研究目标理解的假设。