Suppr超能文献

关于研究伦理的实证研究。

Empirical research on research ethics.

作者信息

Sieber Joan E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, California State University, Hayward, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ethics Behav. 2004;14(4):397-412. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1404_9.

Abstract

Ethics is normative; ethics indicates, in broad terms, what researchers should do. For example, researchers should respect human participants. Empirical study tells us what actually happens. Empirical research is often needed to fine-tune the best ways to achieve normative objectives, for example, to discover how best to achieve the dual aims of gaining important knowledge and respecting participants. Ethical decision making by scientists and institutional review boards should not be based on hunches and anecdotes (e.g., about such matters as what information potential research participants would want to know and what they understand, or what they consider to be acceptable risks). These questions should be answered through empirical research. Some of the preceding articles in this special issue illustrate uses of empirical research on research ethics. This article places empirical research on research ethics into broader perspective and challenges investigators to use the tools of their disciplines to proactively solve ethical problems for which there currently exist no empirically proven solutions.

摘要

伦理学具有规范性;宽泛而言,伦理学指明了研究人员应该做什么。例如,研究人员应该尊重人类受试者。实证研究告诉我们实际发生了什么。通常需要进行实证研究来微调实现规范性目标的最佳方式,例如,去发现如何最好地实现获取重要知识和尊重受试者这两个双重目标。科学家和机构审查委员会的伦理决策不应基于直觉和轶事(比如关于潜在研究受试者想要知道什么信息、他们理解什么,或者他们认为什么是可接受的风险等问题)。这些问题应该通过实证研究来回答。本期特刊之前的一些文章阐述了实证研究在研究伦理方面的应用。本文将研究伦理的实证研究置于更广阔的视角,并向研究人员提出挑战,要求他们运用本学科的工具,积极主动地解决目前尚无经实证验证的解决方案的伦理问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验