Ferone D, Resmini E, Boschetti M, Arvigo M, Albanese V, Ceresola E, Pivonello R, Albertelli M, Bianchi F, Giusti M, Minuto F
Department of Endocrinological and Metabolic Sciences, University of Genova, Italy.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28(11 Suppl International):111-7.
Among hormones and neuropeptides influencing the immune system, somatostatin seems to play a key role not only in inhibiting specific immune cell activities, but also in promoting selected functions of particular immune cell subsets. Indeed, controversial effects have been observed in experimental conditions where somatostatin seems to stimulate certain cell functions, such as secretion of specific products (immunoglobulin, cytokines), cell migration and adhesion to extracellular matrix components. However, interestingly, cortistatin (CST), a neuropeptide that strongly resembles somatostatin, from both the structural and functional points of view, seems to have potential roles in regulating immune responses, as well as other lymphoid cell functions. The unexpected wide distribution of CST in a number of human organs, but particularly in immune cells, points to a broader physiological role of CST than previously presumed. The actions of somatostatin and its synthetic analogs (SSA) are mediated by five membrane G protein-coupled receptors subtypes (SSTR1-5), displaying a tissue specific distribution. The majority of somatostatin-target tissues, including lymphoid tissues, may co-express multiple somatostatin receptor (SSTR). The number of SSTRs in lymphoid cells is significantly lower compared to neuroendocrine tissues. However, the presence of receptors allowed the localization by in vivo SSTR scintigraphy of lymphoproliferative disorders, as well as granulomatous and autoimmune diseases. In specific cases, this technique may contribute to establishing the diagnosis and staging the disease. Recent studies evaluating the specific and quantitative SSTR distribution in lymphoid organs and cells, in both normal conditions and immune disorders, have largely contributed to better understand the phenomenology of in vivo receptor imaging and also the involvement of the different SSTR in determining the uptake of radiolabeled SSAs. Moreover, since lymphomas are highly radiosensitive malignancies, a promising approach in refractory patients with malignant lymphomas may be represented by radionuclide-targeted therapy with radioactive-coupled SSAs combined with gene therapy. This latter technique seems effective in inducing the expression or increasing the number of given SSTR in order to ameliorate the impact of radionuclide-targeted therapy. Medical treatment of lymphoproliferative diseases with currently available synthetic analogs have produced unsatisfactory and conflicting results. This might be due to the affinity of the current available SSAs for specific SSTR. However, the synthesis of new compounds with distinct properties has reopened a challenge in this field. The application of receptor-based localization and anti-tumor strategies should also be taking into account the new knowledge recently emerged on the physiopathology of neuropeptide receptors: firstly, neuropeptide receptor homo- and heterodimerization, which may involve different subtypes of SSTRs, as well as other neuropetide receptors, and secondly, the role of endogenous SSTR ligands, such as CST.
在影响免疫系统的激素和神经肽中,生长抑素似乎不仅在抑制特定免疫细胞活性方面发挥关键作用,而且在促进特定免疫细胞亚群的某些功能方面也发挥关键作用。事实上,在实验条件下观察到了相互矛盾的效应,在这些条件下,生长抑素似乎能刺激某些细胞功能,如特定产物(免疫球蛋白、细胞因子)的分泌、细胞迁移以及与细胞外基质成分的黏附。然而,有趣的是,促皮质素(CST),一种从结构和功能角度都与生长抑素极为相似的神经肽,似乎在调节免疫反应以及其他淋巴细胞功能方面具有潜在作用。CST在许多人体器官中意外广泛分布,尤其是在免疫细胞中,这表明CST的生理作用比先前推测的更为广泛。生长抑素及其合成类似物(SSA)的作用由五种膜G蛋白偶联受体亚型(SSTR1 - 5)介导,呈现出组织特异性分布。大多数生长抑素作用的靶组织,包括淋巴组织,可能共表达多种生长抑素受体(SSTR)。与神经内分泌组织相比,淋巴细胞中SSTR的数量显著更低。然而,受体的存在使得通过体内SSTR闪烁扫描定位淋巴增殖性疾病以及肉芽肿性和自身免疫性疾病成为可能。在特定情况下,这项技术可能有助于疾病的诊断和分期。最近评估正常和免疫紊乱状态下淋巴器官和细胞中SSTR特异性和定量分布的研究,在很大程度上有助于更好地理解体内受体成像的现象学,以及不同SSTR在决定放射性标记SSA摄取中的作用。此外,由于淋巴瘤是高度放射敏感的恶性肿瘤,对于难治性恶性淋巴瘤患者,一种有前景的方法可能是以放射性偶联SSA的放射性核素靶向治疗联合基因治疗为代表。后一种技术似乎在诱导特定SSTR的表达或增加其数量以改善放射性核素靶向治疗的效果方面是有效的。用目前可用的合成类似物对淋巴增殖性疾病进行药物治疗产生了不尽人意且相互矛盾的结果。这可能是由于目前可用的SSA对特定SSTR的亲和力所致。然而,具有不同特性的新化合物的合成在该领域重新开启了一项挑战。基于受体的定位和抗肿瘤策略的应用还应考虑到最近在神经肽受体生理病理学方面出现的新知识:首先,神经肽受体的同源和异源二聚化,这可能涉及不同亚型的SSTR以及其他神经肽受体;其次,内源性SSTR配体,如CST的作用。