Gauna C, van der Lely A J
Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28(11 Suppl International):127-31.
At first sight, the title is confusing as it seems to try to merge four unrelated topics into a single presentation. Somatostatin, cortistatin (CST) and ghrelin display broad biological activities, including metabolic effects. However, although apparently unrelated, these peptides entities have more in common than it might be expected and their reciprocal interactions give a new perspective to the hormonal regulation of glucose metabolism. Let's analyze the ghrelin receptor subtype GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor 1a (R1a). Taking into account the GHS-R1a as receptor of reference, acylated ghrelin is one of its natural ligands. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that also CST, a neuropeptide, binds with high affinity to the GHS-R1a in human hypothalamus and pituitary tissues. CST is a recently described neuropeptide showing high structural homology with somatostatin that binds to all somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTRs) with an affinity (1-2 nM). In fact, CST and somatostatin exhibit the same endocrine activities. The existence of specific receptors which selectively bind somatostatin or CST has been hypothesized, based on evidence that CST possesses an action profile different from somatostatin and that CST and somatostatin are often co-expressed in the same neurons but are regulated by different stimuli. Given these findings, the ability of CST to bind the GHS-R1a is of particular relevance because somatostatin and its fragments do not bind the same receptor. Interestingly, the classical synthetic somatostatin analogs, i.e. octreotide, lanreotide and vapreotide bind the GHS-R1a with an affinity lower than that of CST. These findings have generated the hypothesis that CST, because of its ability to bind both SSTRs and GHSRs, would represent the link between ghrelin and "somatostatin/CST" system that had not previously been demonstrated. On the other hand, the GHS-R1a is unlikely to be the only GHS-R. It has been already demonstrated that a GHS-R subtype able to bind non-acylated as well as acylated ghrelin exists and likely mediates biological activities. Another GHS-R subtype likely mediates the influence of unacylated ghrelin on glucose metabolism, since it does not bind nor activates the GHS-R1a. Given this complexity, it is clear that further studies are required to clarify whether ghrelin is the sole ligand or one of a number of ligands activating the GHS-R 1a and whether that receptor used for ghrelin isolation is the sole receptor or one of a group of receptors for such ligands.
乍一看,这个标题令人困惑,因为它似乎试图将四个不相关的主题合并到一个展示中。生长抑素、皮质抑素(CST)和胃饥饿素具有广泛的生物学活性,包括代谢作用。然而,尽管这些肽类物质表面上不相关,但它们的共同之处比预期的要多,并且它们之间的相互作用为葡萄糖代谢的激素调节提供了新的视角。让我们来分析一下胃饥饿素受体亚型生长激素促分泌素(GHS)受体1a(R1a)。以GHS-R1a作为参考受体,酰化胃饥饿素是其天然配体之一。有趣的是,已经证明,神经肽CST在人下丘脑和垂体组织中也能以高亲和力与GHS-R1a结合。CST是一种最近被描述的神经肽,与生长抑素具有高度的结构同源性,能以1-2 nM的亲和力与所有生长抑素受体亚型(SSTRs)结合。事实上,CST和生长抑素表现出相同的内分泌活性。基于CST具有与生长抑素不同的作用模式,以及CST和生长抑素经常在同一神经元中共表达但受不同刺激调节的证据,有人推测存在选择性结合生长抑素或CST的特异性受体。鉴于这些发现,CST与GHS-R1a结合的能力尤为重要,因为生长抑素及其片段不与同一受体结合。有趣的是,经典的合成生长抑素类似物,即奥曲肽、兰瑞肽和伐普肽与GHS-R1a的结合亲和力低于CST。这些发现引发了这样一种假设,即由于CST能够同时结合SSTRs和GHSRs,它可能代表了胃饥饿素与“生长抑素/CST”系统之间的联系,而这一点此前尚未得到证实。另一方面,GHS-R1a不太可能是唯一的GHS-R。已经证明存在一种能够结合非酰化和酰化胃饥饿素的GHS-R亚型,并且可能介导生物学活性。另一种GHS-R亚型可能介导非酰化胃饥饿素对葡萄糖代谢的影响,因为它既不结合也不激活GHS-R1a。鉴于这种复杂性,显然需要进一步研究来阐明胃饥饿素是激活GHS-R 1a的唯一配体还是多种配体之一,以及用于分离胃饥饿素的受体是唯一的受体还是这类配体的一组受体之一。