Suppr超能文献

生长抑素和促皮质素释放因子受体的药理学特征

Pharmacological profile of somatostatin and cortistatin receptors.

作者信息

Siehler Sandra, Nunn Caroline, Hannon Jason, Feuerbach Dominik, Hoyer Daniel

机构信息

Neuroscience Research, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008 May 14;286(1-2):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.12.007. Epub 2007 Dec 23.

Abstract

Somatostatin (SRIF) and cortistatin (CST) are two endogenous peptides with high sequence similarities that act as hormones/neurotransmitters both in the CNS and the periphery; their genes although distinct result from gene duplication. Their receptors appear to be common, since the five known SRIF receptors (sst1-sst5) have similar subnanomolar affinity for SRIF and CST, whether the short (SRIF-14, CST-14, CST-17) or the long versions (SRIF-28, CST-29) of the peptides. Whether CST targets specific receptors not shared by SRIF, is still debated: MrgX2 has been described as a selective CST receptor, with submicromolar affinity for CST but devoid of affinity for SRIF; however the distribution of CST and MrgX2 is largely different, and there is no MrgX2 in rodents. A similar situation arises with the GHS receptor GHS-R1a, which displays some preferential affinity for CST over SRIF, but for which there is no evidence that it is activated by CST in vivo. In both cases, one may argue that submicromolar affinity is not the norm of a GPCR for its endogenous neuropeptide. On the other hand, all receptors known to bind SRIF have similar high affinity for CST and both peptides act as potent agonists at the sst1-sst5 receptors, whichever transduction pathway is considered. In addition, [(125)I][Tyr(10)]CST(14) labels sst1-sst5 receptors with subnanomolar affinity, and [(125)I][Tyr(10)]CST(14) binding in the brain is overlapping with that of [(125)I][Tyr(0)]SRIF(14). The functional differences reported that distinguish CST from SRIF, have not been explained convincingly and may relate to ligand-driven transductional selectivity, and other complicating factors such as receptor dimerisation, (homo or heterodimerisation), and/or the influence of accessory proteins (GIPs, RAMPS), which remain to be studied in more detail.

摘要

生长抑素(SRIF)和可体松(CST)是两种序列高度相似的内源性肽,它们在中枢神经系统和外周均作为激素/神经递质发挥作用;它们的基因虽不同,但源于基因复制。它们的受体似乎是共同的,因为已知的五种生长抑素受体(sst1 - sst5)对SRIF和CST具有相似的亚纳摩尔亲和力,无论肽是短版本(SRIF - 14、CST - 14、CST - 17)还是长版本(SRIF - 28、CST - 29)。CST是否靶向SRIF所不共有的特定受体仍存在争议:MrgX2已被描述为一种选择性CST受体,对CST具有亚微摩尔亲和力,但对SRIF没有亲和力;然而,CST和MrgX2的分布差异很大,并且在啮齿动物中没有MrgX2。生长激素促分泌素受体GHS - R1a也出现类似情况,它对CST的亲和力比对SRIF略高,但没有证据表明它在体内被CST激活。在这两种情况下,有人可能会认为亚微摩尔亲和力并非GPCR对其内源性神经肽的常态。另一方面,所有已知能结合SRIF的受体对CST都具有相似的高亲和力,并且无论考虑哪种转导途径,这两种肽在sst1 - sst5受体上都作为强效激动剂起作用。此外,[(125)I][Tyr(10)]CST(14)以亚纳摩尔亲和力标记sst1 - sst5受体,并且[(125)I][Tyr(10)]CST(14)在脑中的结合与[(125)I][Tyr(0)]SRIF(14)的结合重叠。所报道的区分CST与SRIF的功能差异尚未得到令人信服的解释,可能与配体驱动的转导选择性以及其他复杂因素有关,如受体二聚化(同二聚化或异二聚化)和/或辅助蛋白(GIPs、RAMPS)的影响,这些仍有待更详细地研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验