Ingram Donald K, Zhu Min, Mamczarz Jacek, Zou Sige, Lane Mark A, Roth George S, deCabo Rafael
Laboratory of Experimental Gerontology, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Aging Cell. 2006 Apr;5(2):97-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00202.x.
When considering all possible aging interventions evaluated to date, it is clear that calorie restriction (CR) remains the most robust. Studies in numerous species have demonstrated that reduction of calories 30-50% below ad libitum levels of a nutritious diet can increase lifespan, reduce the incidence and delay the onset of age-related diseases, improve stress resistance, and decelerate functional decline. A current major focus of this research area is whether this nutritional intervention is relevant to human aging. Evidence emerging from studies in rhesus monkeys suggests that their response to CR parallels that observed in rodents. To assess CR effects in humans, clinical trials have been initiated. However, even if results from these studies could eventually substantiate CR as an effective pro-longevity strategy for humans, the utility of this intervention would be hampered because of the degree and length of restriction required. As an alternative strategy, new research has focused on the development of 'CR mimetics'. The objective of this strategy is to identify compounds that mimic CR effects by targeting metabolic and stress response pathways affected by CR, but without actually restricting caloric intake. For example, drugs that inhibit glycolysis (2-deoxyglucose), enhance insulin action (metformin), or affect stress signaling pathways (resveratrol), are being assessed as CR mimetics (CRM). Promising results have emerged from initial studies regarding physiological responses which resemble those observed in CR (e.g. reduced body temperature and plasma insulin) as well as protection against neurotoxicity (e.g. enhanced dopamine action and up-regulated neurotrophic factors). Ultimately, lifespan analyses in addition to expanded toxicity studies must be accomplished to fully assess the potential of any CRM. Nonetheless, this strategy clearly offers a very promising and expanding research endeavor.
在考量迄今为止评估过的所有可能的衰老干预措施时,很明显,热量限制(CR)仍然是最有效的。对众多物种的研究表明,将热量摄入减少至低于营养丰富饮食的自由进食水平30 - 50%,可以延长寿命、降低与年龄相关疾病的发病率并延缓其发病、提高抗应激能力以及减缓功能衰退。该研究领域当前的一个主要关注点是这种营养干预措施是否与人类衰老相关。来自恒河猴研究的证据表明,它们对热量限制的反应与在啮齿动物中观察到的相似。为了评估热量限制对人类的影响,已经启动了临床试验。然而,即使这些研究的结果最终能够证实热量限制是一种对人类有效的延长寿命策略,由于所需限制的程度和时长,这种干预措施的实用性也会受到阻碍。作为一种替代策略,新的研究聚焦于“热量限制模拟物”的开发。该策略的目标是识别通过靶向受热量限制影响的代谢和应激反应途径来模拟热量限制效果的化合物,但实际上并不限制热量摄入。例如,抑制糖酵解的药物(2 - 脱氧葡萄糖)、增强胰岛素作用的药物(二甲双胍)或影响应激信号通路的药物(白藜芦醇),都正在作为热量限制模拟物(CRM)进行评估。关于生理反应的初步研究已经取得了有前景的结果,这些反应类似于在热量限制中观察到的反应(例如体温降低和血浆胰岛素减少)以及对神经毒性的保护作用(例如增强多巴胺作用和上调神经营养因子)。最终,除了扩大毒性研究外,还必须完成寿命分析,以全面评估任何热量限制模拟物的潜力。尽管如此,这一策略显然提供了一项非常有前景且不断扩展的研究工作。