• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与摆式矫治器随后进行固定正畸治疗相关的牙槽骨和骨骼变化。

Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.

作者信息

Angelieri Fernanda, Almeida Renato Rodrigues de, Almeida Marcio Rodrigues de, Fuziy Acácio

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr;129(4):520-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.003
PMID:16627178
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This prospective clinical study analyzed the distalization of maxillary molars achieved by the pendulum appliance and its effect on the anchorage teeth during and after fixed orthodontic treatment.

METHODS

Lateral cephalograms of 22 adolescents (15 girls, 7 boys) taken pretreatment, after distalization, after leveling and aligning, and after fixed orthodontic treatment were evaluated. The initial mean age was 14.5 years (SD = 1.80). The mean time for distalization of the maxillary molars was 5.85 months (SD = 1.82), and the total treatment time was 3.61 years (SD = 1.83).

RESULTS

The pendulum appliance moved the maxillary molars distally, but with significant distal inclination, protrusion of the anterior teeth, and increase in lower anterior facial height (LAFH) due to the clockwise mandibular rotation. After fixed orthodontic treatment, the maxillary incisors and the maxillary first premolars and first molars were returned to their pretreatment anteroposterior positions. Thus, at postdistalization, there was 2.1 mm of protrusion of the maxillary first molars, despite the anchorage reinforcement (Nance button and cervical headgear worn at night during fixed appliance therapy). However, at the end of treatment, all patients had Class I molar relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

The pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment corrected the Class II sagittal relationship, especially due to the dentoalveolar changes secondary to the spontaneous mandibular growth in the anterior direction during fixed appliance treatment.

摘要

引言

本前瞻性临床研究分析了摆式矫治器实现上颌磨牙远移的情况及其在固定正畸治疗期间和之后对支抗牙的影响。

方法

对22名青少年(15名女孩,7名男孩)治疗前、远移后、排齐整平后以及固定正畸治疗后的头颅侧位片进行评估。初始平均年龄为14.5岁(标准差 = 1.80)。上颌磨牙远移的平均时间为5.85个月(标准差 = 1.82),总治疗时间为3.61年(标准差 = 1.83)。

结果

摆式矫治器使上颌磨牙远移,但伴有明显的远中倾斜、前牙前突以及由于下颌顺时针旋转导致的下前牙面部高度增加。固定正畸治疗后,上颌切牙、上颌第一前磨牙和第一磨牙恢复到治疗前的前后位置。因此,在远移后,尽管采用了支抗增强措施(固定矫治器治疗期间夜间佩戴Nance弓和颈带),上颌第一磨牙仍有2.1 mm的前突。然而,在治疗结束时,所有患者均达到磨牙Ⅰ类关系。

结论

摆式矫治器联合固定正畸治疗纠正了Ⅱ类矢状关系,特别是由于固定矫治器治疗期间下颌向前自发生长继发的牙牙槽骨改变。

相似文献

1
Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.与摆式矫治器随后进行固定正畸治疗相关的牙槽骨和骨骼变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr;129(4):520-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.003.
2
Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.使用摆式矫治器远移上颌磨牙后的矢状、垂直和横向变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Oct;130(4):502-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.031.
3
Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.成人上颌牙牙槽骨前突患者使用骨锚固与口外锚固治疗效果的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.022.
4
A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.两种口腔内磨牙远移矫治器的比较:远中喷射器与摆式矫治器。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):353-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.031.
5
Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.II类错牙合畸形治疗中,Jones矫治器联合固定矫治器的头影测量效果
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):44-51. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.044-051.oar.
6
Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.摆式矫治器、高位头帽以及拔除两颗前磨牙后使用固定矫治器对安氏II类错牙合患者的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Dec;136(6):833-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.032.
7
Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.与摆式矫治器相关的牙槽骨和骨骼变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Mar;117(3):333-43. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70238-1.
8
Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.上颌磨牙远中移动或下颌前伸:包括摆锤矫治器和Herbst矫治器的综合正畸治疗的头影测量比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Feb;123(2):108-16. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.7.
9
The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.钟摆式、K环和远中喷射远中移动技术在儿童生长发育中的有效性及其对支抗单位的影响:一项比较研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Oct-Dec;34(4):331-40. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.191411.
10
Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.头帽与摆式矫治器联合固定正畸治疗的效果比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):572-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn060.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial.摆式矫治器与透明牙套在治疗安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)中垂直向变化的随机前瞻性临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02483-w.
2
Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class.三种口内远中移动力系统(琼斯矫治器、远中喷射器和一类矫治器)导致的矢状向、旋转和横向变化
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 1;13(5):e455-e462. doi: 10.4317/jced.57993. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Efficiency of the skeletonized Pendulum K appliance for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization : A clinical pilot study.
骨架式 Pendulum K 矫治器治疗非顺应性上颌磨牙远移的效率:一项临床初步研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2021 Nov;82(6):391-402. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00280-8. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
Soft tissue effects of three different Class II/1-camouflage treatment strategies.三种不同的二类1分类掩饰治疗策略的软组织效应
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Mar;78(2):153-165. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0066-9. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
5
Evaluation of long-term stability of mesiodistal axial inclinations of maxillary molars through panoramic radiographs in subjects treated with Pendulum appliance.通过全景X线片评估使用摆式矫治器治疗的受试者上颌磨牙近远中轴向倾斜度的长期稳定性。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jan-Feb;21(1):67-74. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.067-074.oar.
6
Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy using pendulum and distal screw appliances.使用摆锤式矫治器和远中螺钉矫治器进行磨牙远移治疗的比较评估。
Korean J Orthod. 2015 Jul;45(4):171-9. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.171. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
7
Response of the maxillary dentition to a statically determinate one-couple system with tip-back mechanics: A prospective clinical trial.上颌牙列对采用后倾力学的静定单力偶系统的反应:一项前瞻性临床试验。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Jan;86(1):32-8. doi: 10.2319/012815-68.1. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.II类错牙合畸形治疗中,Jones矫治器联合固定矫治器的头影测量效果
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):44-51. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.044-051.oar.
9
Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.已萌出第二磨牙情况下磨牙远移治疗的比较评估:片段弓矫治器与四眼簧矫治器对比
Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0049-6. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
10
Long-term evaluation of the molar movements following Pendulum and fixed appliances.磨牙远移的长期评价: Pendulum 与固定矫治器的对比。
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):447-54. doi: 10.2319/050812-378.1. Epub 2012 Oct 18.