Chen H A, Johnson B D, Sims T J, Darveau R P, Moncla B J, Whitney C W, Engel D, Page R C
Research Center in Oral Biology, University of Washington, Seattle.
J Periodontol. 1991 Dec;62(12):781-91. doi: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.12.781.
We have performed studies aimed at elucidating the nature of the humoral immune response in rapidly progressive periodontitis (RPP). We analyzed the sera of 36 periodontally normal subjects and 36 RPP patients for titers and avidities of IgG antibodies reactive with the antigens of Porphyromonas gingivalis using ELISA, prior to and following treatment. We used whole-cell sonicate, purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and total extractable protein as plate antigens. Twelve of the patients had antibody titers at least 2-fold greater than the median of the controls and were designated as seropositive. The remaining 24 patients had titers that did not exceed twice the median titer of the controls and were designated as seronegative. For both patient groups, antibody titers were highest when whole-cell antigen was used, intermediate for LPS, and lowest for the protein fraction. Following treatment, median titer for seropositive patients decreased from pretreatment values of 241.7 to 76.5, while median titer for seronegative patients increased from 39.5 to 80.1. Avidities of pretreatment sera from both patient groups for all 3 antigen preparations were lower than the median avidities of the control sera. Avidity significantly increased following treatment to levels greater than those for control sera in both patient groups. Thus, some young adults with severe periodontitis mount a humoral immune response and produce high levels of serum IgG antibodies reactive with antigens of P. gingivalis, while others do not. The antibodies produced are of relatively low avidity, and may therefore be relatively ineffective biologically. Therapy, which greatly reduces antigen load, appears to stimulate production of higher avidity IgG antibodies in both patient groups; in the seropositive group, low avidity antibodies appear to be replaced by antibodies of higher avidity. Both the purified LPS and protein fractions contain reactive antigen(s), although LPS binds more antibody. Our data are consistent with the idea that many RPP patients do not produce protective levels of biologically functional antibody during the course of their natural infection, but they may be stimulated to do so by treatment.
我们开展了旨在阐明快速进展性牙周炎(RPP)中体液免疫反应本质的研究。我们采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)分析了36名牙周正常受试者和36名RPP患者治疗前后血清中与牙龈卟啉单胞菌抗原反应的IgG抗体滴度和亲和力。我们使用全细胞超声裂解物、纯化的脂多糖(LPS)和总可提取蛋白作为包被抗原。12名患者的抗体滴度至少比对照组中位数高2倍,被指定为血清阳性。其余24名患者的滴度不超过对照组中位数滴度的两倍,被指定为血清阴性。对于两组患者,使用全细胞抗原时抗体滴度最高,LPS次之,蛋白质组分最低。治疗后,血清阳性患者的中位数滴度从治疗前的241.7降至76.5,而血清阴性患者的中位数滴度从39.5升至80.1。两组患者治疗前血清对所有3种抗原制剂的亲和力均低于对照血清的中位数亲和力。治疗后,两组患者的亲和力均显著增加,高于对照血清。因此,一些患有严重牙周炎的年轻成年人会产生体液免疫反应,并产生高水平的与牙龈卟啉单胞菌抗原反应的血清IgG抗体,而另一些人则不会。产生的抗体亲和力相对较低,因此在生物学上可能相对无效。大大降低抗原负荷的治疗似乎能刺激两组患者产生更高亲和力的IgG抗体;在血清阳性组中,低亲和力抗体似乎被高亲和力抗体所取代。纯化的LPS和蛋白质组分均含有反应性抗原,尽管LPS结合的抗体更多。我们的数据与以下观点一致,即许多RPP患者在自然感染过程中不会产生具有生物学功能的保护性抗体水平,但治疗可能会刺激他们产生。