Suppr超能文献

传统起搏器植入患者升级为双心室起搏治疗心力衰竭:一项双盲、随机交叉研究。

Upgrade to biventricular pacing in patients with conventional pacemakers and heart failure: a double-blind, randomized crossover study.

作者信息

Höijer Carl J, Meurling Carl, Brandt Johan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Division, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Europace. 2006 Jan;8(1):51-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/euj014.

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate whether patients with previously implanted conventional pacemakers and severe heart failure benefit from an upgrade to a biventricular system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Study inclusion criteria were New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes III and IV, dominant paced rhythm, and no left bundle branch block in the pre-pacing ECG. Ten patients with pacemakers (four VVIR due to slow atrial fibrillation and six DDDR, of which four were due to high-degree atrioventricular block and two to sinus node disease) were upgraded to a biventricular pacing (BVP) system. The median duration of pacing before the upgrade was 5.7 years. Assessments of 6-min walk test, symptom score, brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), and echocardiography were made pre-operatively. After a run-in period of 1 month in BVP following the upgrade, the patients were randomized to a 2-month period in either BVP or right ventricular pacing (RVP), followed by 2 months in the other mode, in a double-blind crossover fashion. After each period, the pre-operative measurements were repeated. After study completion, patients were asked to select their preferred period. The median 6-min walking distance was significantly longer in BVP (400 m) vs. RVP (315 m), P = 0.02. The symptom score was also significantly better in BVP (P = 0.005). Median pro-BNP was significantly lower in BVP than in RVP, 3,030 vs. 5,064 ng/L (P = 0.005). Six patients demanded an early crossover in RVP but none in BVP (P = 0.015), and all patients except one expressed a preference for BVP. However, echo parameters did not show any significant differences between BVP and RVP.

CONCLUSION

Pacemaker patients with heart failure and dominant paced heart rhythm benefit substantially from an upgrade to BVP, in terms of physical performance and symptoms. The upgrade resulted in significantly improved cardiac function as reflected by reduced levels of pro-BNP.

摘要

目的

研究既往植入传统起搏器且患有严重心力衰竭的患者升级为双心室系统是否有益。

方法与结果

研究纳入标准为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级、起搏心律为主、起搏前心电图无左束支传导阻滞。10例起搏器患者(4例因缓慢型心房颤动植入VVIR起搏器,6例植入DDDR起搏器,其中4例因高度房室传导阻滞,2例因窦房结疾病)升级为双心室起搏(BVP)系统。升级前起搏的中位持续时间为5.7年。术前进行6分钟步行试验、症状评分、脑钠肽(pro-BNP)及超声心动图评估。升级至BVP后经过1个月的磨合期,患者以双盲交叉方式随机分为2个月的BVP或右心室起搏(RVP)期,然后再进行2个月的另一种起搏模式。每个阶段结束后,重复术前测量。研究结束后,要求患者选择他们偏好的阶段。BVP组的中位6分钟步行距离(400米)显著长于RVP组(315米),P = 0.02。BVP组的症状评分也显著更好(P = 0.005)。BVP组的中位pro-BNP显著低于RVP组,分别为3030 ng/L和5064 ng/L(P = 0.005)。6例患者要求在RVP期提前交叉,但BVP期无患者要求(P = 0.015),除1例患者外,所有患者均表示偏好BVP。然而,超声心动图参数在BVP和RVP之间未显示任何显著差异。

结论

心力衰竭且起搏心律为主的起搏器患者升级为BVP后,在身体机能和症状方面有显著获益。升级导致pro-BNP水平降低,反映出心脏功能显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验