Suppr超能文献

多部位双心室起搏对心力衰竭合并室内传导延迟患者的影响。

Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay.

作者信息

Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, Walker S, Varma C, Linde C, Garrigue S, Kappenberger L, Haywood G A, Santini M, Bailleul C, Daubert J C

机构信息

InParys, Saint-Cloud, France.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 22;344(12):873-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103223441202.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One third of patients with chronic heart failure have electrocardiographic evidence of a major intraventricular conduction delay, which may worsen left ventricular systolic dysfunction through asynchronous ventricular contraction. Uncontrolled studies suggest that multisite biventricular pacing improves hemodynamics and well-being by reducing ventricular asynchrony. We assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of this new therapy.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III) due to chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, with normal sinus rhythm and a duration of the QRS interval of more than 150 msec, received transvenous atriobiventricular pacemakers (with leads in one atrium and each ventricle). This single-blind, randomized, controlled crossover study compared the responses of the patients during two periods: a three-month period of inactive pacing (ventricular inhibited pacing at a basic rate of 40 bpm) and a three-month period of active (atriobiventricular) pacing. The primary end point was the distance walked in six minutes; the secondary end points were the quality of life as measured by questionnaire, peak oxygen consumption, hospitalizations related to heart failure, the patients' treatment preference (active vs. inactive pacing), and the mortality rate.

RESULTS

Nine patients were withdrawn from the study before randomization, and 10 failed to complete both study periods. Thus, 48 patients completed both phases of the study. The mean distance walked in six minutes was 22 percent greater with active pacing (399+/-100 m vs. 326+/-134 m, P<0.001), the quality-of-life score improved by 32 percent (P<0.001), peak oxygen uptake increased by 8 percent (P<0.03), hospitalizations were decreased by two thirds (P<0.05), and active pacing was preferred by 85 percent of the patients (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is technically complex, atriobiventricular pacing significantly improves exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay.

摘要

背景

三分之一的慢性心力衰竭患者有严重室内传导延迟的心电图证据,这可能通过心室收缩不同步加重左心室收缩功能障碍。非对照研究表明,多部位双心室起搏通过减少心室不同步改善血流动力学和健康状况。我们评估了这种新疗法的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

67例因慢性左心室收缩功能障碍导致严重心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会III级)、窦性心律正常且QRS间期持续时间超过150毫秒的患者接受了经静脉房室双心室起搏器(电极置于一个心房和每个心室)。这项单盲、随机、对照交叉研究比较了患者在两个阶段的反应:三个月的非活性起搏期(以40次/分的基础频率进行心室抑制起搏)和三个月的活性(房室双心室)起搏期。主要终点是6分钟步行距离;次要终点是通过问卷测量的生活质量、峰值耗氧量、与心力衰竭相关的住院治疗、患者的治疗偏好(活性起搏与非活性起搏)以及死亡率。

结果

9例患者在随机分组前退出研究,10例未完成两个研究阶段。因此,48例患者完成了研究的两个阶段。活性起搏时6分钟平均步行距离增加了22%(399±100米对326±134米,P<0.001),生活质量评分提高了32%(P<0.001),峰值摄氧量增加了8%(P<0.03),住院次数减少了三分之二(P<0.05),85%的患者更喜欢活性起搏(P<0.001)。

结论

尽管技术上复杂,但房室双心室起搏显著改善了慢性心力衰竭和室内传导延迟患者的运动耐量和生活质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验