Davey P G
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Am J Med. 1991 Dec 30;91(6A):101S-105S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90319-s.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of smoking history and age on the efficacy and safety of temafloxacin versus ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin in patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Data were pooled from six clinical trials designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of temafloxacin in bacterial infections of the lower respiratory tract. Patients were selected for this analysis based on smoking history (n = 256) and age (greater than or equal to 65 years of age [n = 328]). Results in the smoker and elderly subgroups were compared between treatment groups and with those in nonsmoker and nonelderly subgroups. Temafloxacin 300 mg or 600 mg b.i.d., ciprofloxacin 500 mg or 750 mg b.i.d., or amoxicillin 500 mg t.i.d. was administered orally for 7-14 days. Patients were assessed at enrollment, on study days 3-7, 24-72 hours post-treatment, and at 5-9 days post-treatment. Temafloxacin and the reference drugs demonstrated comparable clinical efficacy for treatment of LRTI in smokers (93.7% and 92.5%, respectively) and the elderly (94.6% and 89.3%, respectively). However, eradication of baseline pathogens in individual patients was significantly more common after temafloxacin therapy than that following treatment with the reference drugs in both smokers (99.2% versus 91.2%, p = 0.006) and elderly patients (97.5% versus 91.5%, p = 0.028). Overall, eradication rates for pretreatment pathogens were also significantly higher in smokers (99.3% versus 91.8%, p = 0.006) and in the elderly (97.8% versus 92.3%, p = 0.027). Neither age nor smoking status had a consistent effect on the rate of premature discontinuation of study drugs. Adverse events occurred at a similar rate between treatment groups in the elderly and in the smokers. Temafloxacin appears to be a promising alternative to therapy with either ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin in the treatment of respiratory infections in high-risk patients, smokers, and the elderly.
本研究的目的是确定吸烟史和年龄对替马沙星与环丙沙星或阿莫西林治疗下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)患者的疗效和安全性的影响。数据来自六项旨在评估替马沙星在下呼吸道细菌感染中的疗效和安全性的临床试验。根据吸烟史(n = 256)和年龄(大于或等于65岁[n = 328])选择患者进行该分析。比较治疗组中吸烟者和老年亚组的结果,并与非吸烟者和非老年亚组的结果进行比较。口服给予替马沙星300 mg或600 mg,每日两次,环丙沙星500 mg或750 mg,每日两次,或阿莫西林500 mg,每日三次,持续7 - 14天。在入组时、研究第3 - 7天、治疗后24 - 72小时以及治疗后5 - 9天对患者进行评估。替马沙星和参比药物在吸烟者(分别为93.7%和92.5%)和老年人(分别为94.6%和89.3%)中治疗LRTI显示出相当的临床疗效。然而,在吸烟者(99.2%对91.2%,p = 0.006)和老年患者(97.5%对91.5%,p = 0.028)中,替马沙星治疗后个体患者基线病原体的清除明显比参比药物治疗后更常见。总体而言,吸烟者(99.3%对91.8%,p = 0.006)和老年人(97.8%对92.3%,p = 0.027)中预处理病原体的清除率也显著更高。年龄和吸烟状态对研究药物提前停药率均无一致影响。老年患者和吸烟者中各治疗组不良事件的发生率相似。在治疗高危患者、吸烟者和老年人的呼吸道感染方面,替马沙星似乎是环丙沙星或阿莫西林治疗的一个有前景的替代药物。