• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊患者轻至中度下呼吸道感染中替马沙星与环丙沙星的比较。一项多中心、双盲、随机研究。

Temafloxacin compared with ciprofloxacin in mild to moderate lower respiratory tract infections in ambulatory patients. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study.

作者信息

Chodosh S

机构信息

Veterans Administration Outpatient Clinic, Boston 02114.

出版信息

Chest. 1991 Dec;100(6):1497-502. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.6.1497.

DOI:10.1378/chest.100.6.1497
PMID:1659975
Abstract

The efficacy and safety of oral temafloxacin (600 mg) and ciprofloxacin (500 mg) twice daily for seven days were compared in patients with mild to moderate lower respiratory tract infections. Fifty-eight of 64 (91 percent) patients who received temafloxacin and 63 of 67 (94 percent) patients who received ciprofloxacin had clinical cure or improvement; bacteriologic cure occurred in 61 (95 percent) and 63 (94 percent), respectively. All 14 patients with pneumonia were clinically cured or improved and bacteriologically cured; 11 had complete resolution of roentgenographic evidence of pneumonia. Both quinolones eradicated most major respiratory pathogens. In the ciprofloxacin group, organisms persisted in three of seven Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and in one of eight Hemophilus parainfluenzae isolates; all these pathogens were eliminated with temafloxacin. Theophylline blood levels significantly increased by 25 percent in the ciprofloxacin group and decreased by 5 percent in the temafloxacin group. Adverse events, mostly dizziness, headache, and gastrointestinal effects, occurred in 43 percent of temafloxacin patients and in 31 percent of ciprofloxacin patients.

摘要

对患有轻至中度下呼吸道感染的患者比较了口服替马沙星(600毫克)和环丙沙星(500毫克)每日两次、连服七天的疗效和安全性。接受替马沙星治疗的64例患者中有58例(91%)、接受环丙沙星治疗的67例患者中有63例(94%)实现了临床治愈或病情改善;细菌学治愈分别发生在61例(95%)和63例(94%)患者中。所有14例肺炎患者均实现了临床治愈或病情改善以及细菌学治愈;11例患者的肺炎影像学证据完全消失。两种喹诺酮类药物均根除了大多数主要呼吸道病原体。在环丙沙星组中,7株铜绿假单胞菌分离株中有3株、8株副流感嗜血杆菌分离株中有1株的病原体持续存在;而替马沙星消除了所有这些病原体。环丙沙星组中茶碱血药浓度显著升高了25%,替马沙星组中则下降了5%。替马沙星组43%的患者和环丙沙星组31%的患者发生了不良事件,主要为头晕、头痛和胃肠道反应。

相似文献

1
Temafloxacin compared with ciprofloxacin in mild to moderate lower respiratory tract infections in ambulatory patients. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study.门诊患者轻至中度下呼吸道感染中替马沙星与环丙沙星的比较。一项多中心、双盲、随机研究。
Chest. 1991 Dec;100(6):1497-502. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.6.1497.
2
Safety and efficacy of temafloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in lower respiratory tract infections: a randomized, double-blind trial.替马沙星与环丙沙星治疗下呼吸道感染的安全性和有效性:一项随机双盲试验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Jul;30(1):89-100. doi: 10.1093/jac/30.1.89.
3
A double-blind study of once-daily temafloxacin in the treatment of bacterial lower respiratory tract infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Dec;28 Suppl C:73-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.suppl_c.73.
4
Efficacy of temafloxacin versus ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin for lower respiratory tract infections in smokers and the elderly.替马沙星与环丙沙星或阿莫西林治疗吸烟者及老年人下呼吸道感染的疗效比较
Am J Med. 1991 Dec 30;91(6A):101S-105S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90319-s.
5
Systemic antimicrobial therapy in skin and skin structure infections: comparison of temafloxacin and ciprofloxacin.皮肤及皮肤结构感染的全身抗菌治疗:替马沙星与环丙沙星的比较
Am J Med. 1991 Dec 30;91(6A):115S-119S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90322-o.
6
Comparison of three-day temafloxacin with seven-day ciprofloxacin treatment of urinary tract infections in women.女性尿路感染患者中,三日疗法替马沙星与七日疗法环丙沙星的疗效比较。
J Fam Pract. 1992 Feb;34(2):180-4.
7
Treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections with temafloxacin.用替马沙星治疗单纯性尿路感染。
Am J Med. 1991 Dec 30;91(6A):124S-128S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90324-q.
8
Activity of temafloxacin against respiratory pathogens.替马沙星对呼吸道病原体的活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Mar;35(3):423-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.3.423.
9
Efficacy and safety of a 10-day course of 400 or 600 milligrams of grepafloxacin once daily for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: comparison with a 10-day course of 500 milligrams of ciprofloxacin twice daily.每日一次服用400毫克或600毫克格帕沙星,疗程为10天,用于治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的疗效和安全性:与每日两次服用500毫克环丙沙星,疗程为10天进行比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Jan;42(1):114-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.1.114.
10
Temafloxacin: an overview.
Am J Med. 1991 Dec 30;91(6A):166S-172S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90332-r.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients.用于成人门诊社区获得性肺炎的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 9;2014(10):CD002109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002109.pub4.
2
Drug treatment of pneumonia in the elderly: efficacy and costs.老年人肺炎的药物治疗:疗效与成本
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Apr;3(4):268-75. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303040-00003.
3
Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability.环丙沙星。对其药理学、治疗效果及耐受性的最新综述。
Drugs. 1996 Jun;51(6):1019-74. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651060-00010.