Ueda Kimiko, Kawachi Ichiro, Tsukuma Hideaki
Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. kueda@xb4,so-net.ne.jp
Cancer Sci. 2006 Apr;97(4):283-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00179.x.
The purpose of this study was to analyze socioeconomic differences in cervical and corpus cancer survival, and to investigate if the differences are due to differences in age, cancer stage, histology and treatment. A total of 14,055 cases with cervical cancer and 3,113 cases with corpus cancer were obtained from the Osaka Cancer Registry. Municipality-based SES measurements were obtained from the System of Social and Demographic Statistics. Survival analysis was carried out with Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Three types of Cox proportional hazards regression models were tested to assess survival differences among groups and effects of SES on survival, controlling for clinical factors. SES was related to age and cancer stage for cervical and corpus cancer patients, and histology for cervical cancer patients. Differences were observed in cumulative 5-year survival for cervical cancer patients among low, middle and high unemployment municipalities (68.9%, 64.3% and 50.9%, respectively, P<0.0001). Differences in cumulative 5-year survival for cervical cancer patients were also observed among high, middle and low education municipalities (65.1%, 62.2% and 56.1%, respectively, P<0.0001). Similar patterns in 5-year survival were also found for corpus cancer patients. After adjusting for age, cancer stage, histology and treatment, survival differences between patients from high and low SES areas still remained. In conclusion, our population-based analysis of a metropolitan representative sample in Japan has demonstrated, for the first time in Japan, SES differences in survival following cervical and corpus cancer.
本研究旨在分析宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌患者生存情况的社会经济差异,并调查这些差异是否归因于年龄、癌症分期、组织学类型及治疗方法的不同。研究数据来自大阪癌症登记处,共纳入14055例宫颈癌患者和3113例子宫内膜癌患者。社会经济地位(SES)测量数据来自社会和人口统计系统,基于市町村层面进行收集。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线进行生存分析。通过三种Cox比例风险回归模型来评估组间生存差异以及SES对生存的影响,并对临床因素进行校正。宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌患者的SES与年龄和癌症分期有关,而宫颈癌患者的SES还与组织学类型有关。在失业率低、中、高的市町村,宫颈癌患者的5年累积生存率存在差异(分别为68.9%、64.3%和50.9%,P<0.0001)。在教育程度高、中、低的市町村,宫颈癌患者的5年累积生存率也存在差异(分别为65.1%、62.2%和56.1%,P<0.0001)。子宫内膜癌患者的5年生存率也呈现类似模式。在对年龄、癌症分期、组织学类型和治疗方法进行校正后,高SES地区和低SES地区患者之间的生存差异仍然存在。总之,我们基于日本大都市代表性样本的分析首次在日本证明了宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌患者生存情况存在社会经济差异。