Suppr超能文献

解释癌症生存的社会经济不平等因素:系统评价。

Factors Explaining Socio-Economic Inequalities in Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Cancer Epidemiology Division, 56367Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Cancer Health Services Research Unit, Centre for Health Policy, 50066School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211011956. doi: 10.1177/10732748211011956.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is strong and well-documented evidence that socio-economic inequality in cancer survival exists within and between countries, but the underlying causes of these differences are not well understood.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases up to 31 May 2020. Observational studies exploring pathways by which socio-economic position (SEP) might causally influence cancer survival were included.

RESULTS

We found 74 eligible articles published between 2005 and 2020. Cancer stage, other tumor characteristics, health-related lifestyle behaviors, co-morbidities and treatment were reported as key contributing factors, although the potential mediating effect of these factors varied across cancer sites. For common cancers such as breast and prostate cancer, stage of disease was generally cited as the primary explanatory factor, while co-morbid conditions and treatment were also reported to contribute to lower survival for more disadvantaged cases. In contrast, for colorectal cancer, most studies found that stage did not explain the observed differences in survival by SEP. For lung cancer, inequalities in survival appear to be partly explained by receipt of treatment and co-morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies compared regression models with and without adjusting for potential mediators; this method has several limitations in the presence of multiple mediators that could result in biased estimates of mediating effects and invalid conclusions. It is therefore essential that future studies apply modern methods of causal mediation analysis to accurately estimate the contribution of potential explanatory factors for these inequalities, which may translate into effective interventions to improve survival for disadvantaged cancer patients.

摘要

背景

有强有力且有充分文献记录的证据表明,癌症存活率存在于国家内部和国家之间的社会经济不平等,但这些差异的根本原因尚不清楚。

方法

我们系统地检索了 Ovid Medline、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库,检索时间截至 2020 年 5 月 31 日。纳入了探索社会经济地位(SEP)可能通过哪些途径对癌症存活率产生因果影响的观察性研究。

结果

我们发现了 74 篇发表于 2005 年至 2020 年之间的合格文章。癌症分期、其他肿瘤特征、与健康相关的生活方式行为、合并症和治疗被报告为主要的促成因素,尽管这些因素的潜在中介效应在不同的癌症部位有所不同。对于常见的癌症,如乳腺癌和前列腺癌,疾病分期通常被认为是主要的解释因素,而合并症和治疗也被报道为导致处于不利地位的病例存活率较低的因素。相比之下,对于结直肠癌,大多数研究发现,分期并不能解释社会经济地位差异对存活率的影响。对于肺癌,生存方面的不平等似乎部分可以用治疗和合并症来解释。

结论

大多数研究比较了调整和未调整潜在中介因素的回归模型;在存在多个中介因素的情况下,这种方法存在若干局限性,可能导致中介效应的估计值存在偏差和无效的结论。因此,未来的研究必须应用现代因果中介分析方法,准确估计这些不平等的潜在解释因素的贡献,这可能转化为改善弱势癌症患者生存的有效干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/378b/8204531/1ce3597b22f9/10.1177_10732748211011956-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验