Boffetta P, Kogevinas M, Simonato L, Wilbourn J, Saracci R
Unit of Environmental Cancer Epidemiology, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150, Cours Albert-Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 1995 Oct;1(4):315-325. doi: 10.1179/oeh.1995.1.4.315.
On the basis of the International Agency for Research on Cancer's evaluations of occupational exposures, 22 occupational agents are classified as human carcinogens and an additional 22 agents as probable human carcinogens. In addition, evidence of increased risk of cancer was associated with particular industries and occupations, although no specific agents could be identified as etiologic factors. The main problem in the construction and interpretation of such lists is the lack of detailed qualitative and quantitative knowledge about exposures to known or suspected carcinogens. The recent examples of recognized occupational carcinogens, such as cadmium, beryllium, and ethylene oxide, stress the importance of the refinement in the methods for exposure assessment and for statistical analysis on the one hand and the potential benefits from the application of biomarkers of exposure and early effect on the other hand. Other trends that may be identified include the increasing practice of multicentric studies and investigations of exposures relevant to white collar workers and women. Finally, there is a need for investigation of occupational cancer risks in developing countries.
根据国际癌症研究机构对职业暴露的评估,22种职业性致癌物质被归类为人类致癌物,另有22种物质被归类为可能的人类致癌物。此外,癌症风险增加的证据与特定行业和职业有关,尽管无法确定具体的致癌因素。编制和解读此类清单的主要问题在于,缺乏关于已知或疑似致癌物暴露的详细定性和定量知识。近期公认的职业致癌物实例,如镉、铍和环氧乙烷,一方面强调了改进暴露评估方法和统计分析方法的重要性,另一方面也凸显了应用暴露生物标志物和早期效应生物标志物的潜在益处。其他可以确定的趋势包括多中心研究的日益普及,以及对与白领工人和女性相关的暴露情况的调查。最后,发展中国家需要对职业癌症风险展开调查。