• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫内膜癌腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer.

作者信息

Frigerio L, Gallo A, Ghezzi F, Trezzi G, Lussana M, Franchi M

机构信息

Obstetric Department, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jun;93(3):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.011. Epub 2006 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.011
PMID:16631176
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To see whether laparoscopy provides exact staging and effective treatment of endometrial cancer patients, compared with total abdominal hysterectomy, with shorter hospital stay, prompter recovery, and better quality of life.

METHOD

This retrospective study identified 110 patients scheduled for surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer. Fifty-five (50%) were treated by laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and 55 (50%) by total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). All patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy. The majority of patients (79%) had stage I disease.

RESULTS

The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 17 for the LAVH group and 18.5 for the TAH group (p = 0.294). Compared with TAH, LAVH required a significantly longer operating time (220 vs. 175 min; p < 0.01); but shorter hospital stay (4 vs. 8.5 days; p < 0.001) and less estimated blood loss (177 cm3 vs. 285 cm3; p = 0.02). Overall, there were fewer post-operative complications in the LAVH group (6 vs. 11 cases; p < 0.001). Three TAH patients (5.4%) had recurrence of disease. No LAVH patients had recurrences and all are currently disease-free.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest LAVH gives correct staging of endometrial disease, like TAH, but with fewer complications and a slightly longer operating time.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜手术与经腹全子宫切除术,观察腹腔镜手术能否为子宫内膜癌患者提供准确分期及有效治疗,同时缩短住院时间、促进康复并提高生活质量。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了110例计划接受早期子宫内膜癌手术的患者。55例(50%)接受腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH),55例(50%)接受经腹全子宫切除术(TAH)。所有患者均接受盆腔淋巴结清扫术。大多数患者(79%)为Ⅰ期疾病。

结果

LAVH组平均切除淋巴结数为17个,TAH组为18.5个(p = 0.294)。与TAH相比,LAVH手术时间显著更长(220分钟对175分钟;p < 0.01);但住院时间更短(4天对8.5天;p < 0.001),估计失血量更少(177立方厘米对285立方厘米;p = 0.02)。总体而言,LAVH组术后并发症更少(6例对11例;p < 0.001)。3例TAH患者(5.4%)疾病复发。LAVH组无患者复发,目前均无疾病。

结论

这些发现表明,LAVH与TAH一样能对子宫内膜疾病进行正确分期,但并发症更少,手术时间稍长。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jun;93(3):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.011. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
2
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges.腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌:临床疗效与住院费用
Gynecol Oncol. 1999 Apr;73(1):5-11. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5311.
3
Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术治疗临床I期子宫内膜癌的比较:安全性、复发情况及长期预后
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;196(3):248.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.870.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal vs. abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer stage 1.子宫内膜癌1期患者的腹腔镜辅助阴道手术与腹部手术对比
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(9):1138-41. doi: 10.1080/00016340600604195.
5
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与全腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌的随机临床试验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.013.
6
Does the type of surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer affect the rate of reported lymphovascular space invasion in final pathology specimens?早期子宫内膜癌的手术类型是否会影响最终病理标本中报告的淋巴管血管侵犯率?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):71.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
7
[The choice of approach in the surgical management of endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective serie of 155 cases].[子宫内膜癌手术治疗的手术方式选择:155例回顾性系列研究]
Bull Cancer. 2003 Apr;90(4):347-55.
8
Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.全腹子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与全阴道子宫切除术的比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Nov;4(4):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00104.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
9
Laparoscopy as the primary modality for the treatment of women with endometrial carcinoma.腹腔镜检查作为子宫内膜癌女性患者的主要治疗方式。
Cancer. 2001 Jan 15;91(2):378-87. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010115)91:2<378::aid-cncr1012>3.0.co;2-f.
10
Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: comparison of patient outcomes.腹腔镜与经腹子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌:患者结局比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Nov;19(8):1370-6. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a83db8.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective, Observational, Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Goel's Technique of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Carcinoma.评估Goel腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌安全性和有效性的回顾性、观察性、前瞻性研究
Cureus. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):e71525. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71525. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:微创途径子宫切除术与开放手术的比较——系统评价与网状Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 13;16(10):1860. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101860.
3
The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
经腹与腹腔镜下盆腔淋巴结清扫术后症状性淋巴囊肿的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7114-7125. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09227-5. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Surgical staging of endometrial cancer: robotic versus open technique outcomes in a contemporary single surgeon series.子宫内膜癌的手术分期:当代单术者系列中机器人手术与开放手术的结果对比
J Robot Surg. 2011 Jun;5(2):109-14. doi: 10.1007/s11701-010-0239-2. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
5
Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术及开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108361. eCollection 2014.
6
Laparoscopy or laparotomy? A comparison of 240 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜或开腹手术?240 例早期子宫内膜癌患者的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):939-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0565-5. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
7
Realhand high dexterity instruments for the treatment of stage I uterine malignancy.用于治疗I期子宫恶性肿瘤的Realhand高灵活性器械。
JSLS. 2009 Jan-Mar;13(1):27-31.
8
Laparoscopic-assisted staging surgery for Korean women with endometrial cancer.韩国子宫内膜癌女性患者的腹腔镜辅助分期手术
JSLS. 2008 Apr-Jun;12(2):150-5.