• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与经腹子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌:患者结局比较。

Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: comparison of patient outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Nov;19(8):1370-6. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a83db8.

DOI:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a83db8
PMID:20009892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4357489/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the demographics, cancer characteristics, and hospital outcomes of endometrial cancer patients undergoing a laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus a total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH).

METHODS

Two California population databases (Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development and the California Cancer Registry) were linked using patient identifiers. Patients who underwent endometrial cancer surgery from 1997 to 2001 were identified. The combined database was queried for type of surgery, patient demographics, hospital outcomes, comorbidities, and cancer characteristics. Statistical analyses included the t test, chi2 test, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

In this study, 978 endometrial cancer patients (7.7%) had an LAVH and 11,765 (92.3%) had a TAH. The mean ages for the 2 groups were 63.3 and 64.8 years, respectively. Lymphadenectomy was performed more frequently in LAVH patients compared with TAH patients (45.6 vs 41.1%; P = 0.006). Patients undergoing LAVH were more likely to be younger and healthier and have stage I or grade 1 disease (P < 0.0001). Total abdominal hysterectomy patients were more likely to have significant medical comorbidities. Mean length of stay for LAVH was 2.40 versus 4.36 days for TAH (P < 0.001), but mean hospital charges were comparable. Perioperative complications such as vascular and bowel injuries, pulmonary embolism, wound problems, and transfusions were significantly more common in TAH patients.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons seem to carefully select endometrial cancer patients for laparoscopic surgery. Although surgical staging was performed in less than 50% of endometrial cancer patients, the rate was not worse in laparoscopic procedures. Short-term hospital complications were less common in the laparoscopy group.

摘要

目的

比较行腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全子宫切除术(TAH)的子宫内膜癌患者的人口统计学、癌症特征和医院结局。

方法

使用患者标识符将加利福尼亚州两个人口数据库(州卫生计划和发展办公室和加利福尼亚癌症登记处)进行链接。从 1997 年至 2001 年,确定接受子宫内膜癌手术的患者。对合并数据库进行了手术类型、患者人口统计学、医院结局、合并症和癌症特征的查询。统计分析包括 t 检验、卡方检验和逻辑回归。

结果

在这项研究中,978 例子宫内膜癌患者(7.7%)行 LAVH,11765 例(92.3%)行 TAH。两组的平均年龄分别为 63.3 岁和 64.8 岁。与 TAH 患者相比,LAVH 患者行淋巴结切除术的频率更高(45.6%比 41.1%;P=0.006)。行 LAVH 的患者更年轻、更健康,且处于 I 期或 1 级疾病(P<0.0001)。TAH 患者更可能患有严重的医疗合并症。LAVH 的平均住院时间为 2.40 天,TAH 为 4.36 天(P<0.001),但平均住院费用相当。围手术期并发症,如血管和肠损伤、肺栓塞、伤口问题和输血,在 TAH 患者中更为常见。

结论

外科医生似乎仔细选择接受腹腔镜手术的子宫内膜癌患者。尽管不到 50%的子宫内膜癌患者进行了手术分期,但腹腔镜手术的比例并没有更差。腹腔镜组的短期医院并发症较少。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: comparison of patient outcomes.腹腔镜与经腹子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌:患者结局比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Nov;19(8):1370-6. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a83db8.
2
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全子宫切除术(TAH)治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):570-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d8b105.
3
A Comparison of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic and Open Hysterectomy With or Without Lymphadenectomy for Presumed Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Results From the Medical Research Council ASTEC Trial.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术加或不加淋巴结清扫术治疗疑似早期子宫内膜癌的疗效比较:医学研究委员会ASTEC试验结果
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Oct;25(8):1424-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000521.
4
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术手术入路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
5
Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena® for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.子宫切除术、子宫内膜消融术和 Mirena®治疗月经过多:临床有效性和成本效益分析的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Apr;15(19):iii-xvi, 1-252. doi: 10.3310/hta15190.
6
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.手术与药物治疗月经过多的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD003855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003855.pub3.
7
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: An observational study in a French tertiary teaching hospital at the beginning of the learning curve.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌:在法国一家三级教学医院学习曲线初期的一项观察性研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr;54(4):102917. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102917. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
8
Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer.用于子宫内膜癌治疗的淋巴结切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 2;10(10):CD007585. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007585.pub4.
9
Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer.I期子宫内膜癌的辅助放疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14(3):CD003916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003916.pub3.
10
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Minimally Invasive Treatment Approach for Early-Stage Uterine Cervical Cancer: The Impact of the LACC Trial and a Literature Review.早期子宫颈癌的微创治疗方法:LACC试验的影响及文献综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 28;61(4):620. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040620.
2
Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:微创途径子宫切除术与开放手术的比较——系统评价与网状Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 13;16(10):1860. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101860.
3
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience.子宫内膜癌腹腔镜与传统开放手术分期程序的比较研究:我们机构的经验
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2020 Jan 23;9(1):29-33. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
4
Association between Obesity, Surgical Route, and Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Uterine Cancer.子宫癌患者肥胖、手术路径与围手术期结局之间的关联
Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Jun 19;2018:5130856. doi: 10.1155/2018/5130856. eCollection 2018.
5
Single-port access laparoscopic staging operation for a borderline ovarian tumor.单孔腹腔镜分期手术治疗交界性卵巢肿瘤。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Jun 30;22(2):127-30. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2011.22.2.127.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in nonobese and obese women: A consecutive series.非肥胖和肥胖女性子宫内膜癌的腹腔镜治疗:连续病例系列
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Jul-Aug;13(4):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.02.003.
2
Adnexal masses in pregnancy: how often are they malignant?孕期附件肿物:其为恶性的频率如何?
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 May;101(2):315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.10.022. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
3
Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;17(4):343-6. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000175350.18308.73.
4
Morbid obesity and endometrial cancer: surgical, clinical, and pathologic outcomes in surgically managed patients.病态肥胖与子宫内膜癌:手术治疗患者的手术、临床及病理结果
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Dec;95(3):588-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.047.
5
The effect of body mass index on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer.体重指数对子宫内膜癌患者临床/病理特征、手术并发症及预后的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Jul;90(1):150-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00232-4.
6
Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌女性患者腹腔镜手术与传统手术的临床结局及并发症比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004 Jul;270(1):25-30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0488-7. Epub 2003 May 1.
7
Laparoscopic surgery in women with endometrial cancer: the learning curve.子宫内膜癌女性的腹腔镜手术:学习曲线
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Apr 25;107(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00373-1.
8
Can administrative data be used to compare postoperative complication rates across hospitals?行政数据能否用于比较不同医院的术后并发症发生率?
Med Care. 2002 Oct;40(10):856-67. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200210000-00004.
9
Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study.子宫内膜癌的腹腔镜手术:一项多中心研究的长期结果
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2002;23(4):305-10.
10
Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: results of a multicenter study.腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术在子宫内膜癌手术治疗中的应用:一项多中心研究结果
JSLS. 2002 Apr-Jun;6(2):125-31.