• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国立卫生研究院临床试验项目对公众健康和成本的影响。

Effect of a US National Institutes of Health programme of clinical trials on public health and costs.

作者信息

Johnston S Claiborne, Rootenberg John D, Katrak Shereen, Smith Wade S, Elkins Jacob S

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0114, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2006 Apr 22;367(9519):1319-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68578-4.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68578-4
PMID:16631910
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few attempts have been made to estimate the public return on investment in medical research. The total costs and benefits to society of a clinical trial, the final step in testing an intervention, can be estimated by evaluating the effect of trial results on medical care and health.

METHODS

All phase III randomised trials funded by the US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke before Jan 1, 2000, were included. Pertinent publications on use, cost to society, and health effects for each studied intervention were identified by systematic review, supplemented with data from other public and proprietary sources. Regardless of whether a trial was positive or negative, information on use of tested therapies was integrated with published per-use data on costs and health effect (converted to 2004 US dollars) to generate 10-year projections for the US population.

FINDINGS

28 trials with a total cost of 335 million dollars were included. Six trials (21%) resulted in measurable improvements in health, and four (14%) resulted in cost savings to society. At 10 years, the programme of trials resulted in an estimated additional 470,000 quality-adjusted life years at a total cost of 3.6 billion dollars (including costs of all trials and additional health-care and other expenditures). Valuing a quality-adjusted life year at per-head gross domestic product, the projected net benefit to society at 10-years was 15.2 billion dollars. 95% CIs did not include a net loss at 10 years.

IMPLICATIONS

For this institute, the public return on investment in clinical trials has been substantial. Although results led to increases in health-care expenditures, health gains were large and valuable.

摘要

背景

很少有人尝试估算医学研究的公共投资回报。作为测试一种干预措施的最后一步,一项临床试验对社会的总成本和收益可以通过评估试验结果对医疗保健和健康的影响来估算。

方法

纳入了2000年1月1日前由美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所资助的所有III期随机试验。通过系统综述确定了每项研究干预措施的使用情况、社会成本和健康影响的相关出版物,并补充了其他公共和专有来源的数据。无论试验结果是阳性还是阴性,将受试疗法的使用信息与已发表的每次使用的成本和健康影响数据(换算为2004年美元)相结合,以生成美国人群的10年预测数据。

结果

共纳入28项试验,总成本为3.35亿美元。6项试验(21%)使健康状况得到了可衡量的改善,4项试验(14%)为社会节省了成本。在10年时,试验项目估计额外产生了470,000个质量调整生命年,总成本为36亿美元(包括所有试验的成本以及额外的医疗保健和其他支出)。以人均国内生产总值对一个质量调整生命年进行估值,预计10年时对社会的净收益为152亿美元。95%的置信区间不包括10年时的净损失。

结论

对于该研究所而言,临床试验的公共投资回报是巨大的。尽管结果导致了医疗保健支出的增加,但健康收益巨大且有价值。

相似文献

1
Effect of a US National Institutes of Health programme of clinical trials on public health and costs.美国国立卫生研究院临床试验项目对公众健康和成本的影响。
Lancet. 2006 Apr 22;367(9519):1319-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68578-4.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.
6
Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Cluster Headache and Migraine: A Health Technology Assessment.用于丛集性头痛和偏头痛的非侵入性迷走神经刺激:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2025 May 1;25(2):1-177. eCollection 2025.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment.促红细胞生成素α、促红细胞生成素β和达比加群酯治疗癌症相关性贫血(尤其是癌症治疗所致贫血)的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(13):1-202, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11130.
10
A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.阿仑膦酸盐、依替膦酸盐、利塞膦酸盐、雷洛昔芬和特立帕肽用于预防和治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jun;9(22):1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta9220.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the Gap: The State of Global Transplant Research Collaboration.弥合差距:全球移植研究合作现状
Transplant Direct. 2025 Jun 12;11(7):e1819. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001819. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Perceptions and Opinions Towards Data-Sharing: A Survey of Addiction Journal Editorial Board Members.对数据共享的认知与看法:成瘾学期刊编辑委员会成员调查
J Sci Pract Integr. 2022;2022. doi: 10.35122/001c.35597. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Activities critical to success and growth of clinical trials networks. What is needed and how are we doing? An Australian and New Zealand perspective.
临床试验网络成功和发展的关键活动。我们需要什么,我们做得如何?澳大利亚和新西兰的观点。
Trials. 2023 Nov 4;24(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07709-y.
4
Constructing Relative Effect Priors for Research Prioritization and Trial Design: A Meta-epidemiological Analysis.构建相对效应先验,以用于研究优先级排序和试验设计:一项荟萃流行病学分析。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Jul;43(5):553-563. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231165985. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
5
Assessment of redundant randomized clinical trials among patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中冗余随机临床试验的评估。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 24;21(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02749-2.
6
Lack of antiviral activity of probenecid in Vero E6 cells and Syrian golden hamsters: a need for better understanding of inter-lab differences in preclinical assays.丙磺舒在非洲绿猴肾细胞(Vero E6)和叙利亚金黄地鼠中缺乏抗病毒活性:需要更好地理解临床前试验中不同实验室间的差异。
bioRxiv. 2022 Mar 3:2022.03.03.482788. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.03.482788.
7
Converting from face-to-face to postal follow-up and its effects on participant retention, response rates and errors: lessons from the EQUAL study in the UK.从面对面随访转为邮寄随访及其对参与者保留率、应答率和错误率的影响:英国EQUAL 研究的经验教训。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 11;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01453-0.
8
Assessing the performance of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies: developing a multi-country, multi-stakeholder, and multi-dimensional framework to explore mechanisms of impact.评估卫生技术评估(HTA)机构的绩效:构建一个多国、多利益相关方和多维度的框架以探索影响机制。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jul 2;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00290-8.
9
On kernel machine learning for propensity score estimation under complex confounding structures.基于核机器的复杂混杂结构下倾向评分估计的机器学习方法。
Pharm Stat. 2021 Jul;20(4):752-764. doi: 10.1002/pst.2105. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
10
The value proposition of investigator-initiated clinical trials conducted by networks.由网络开展的研究者发起的临床试验的价值主张。
Med J Aust. 2021 Mar;214(4):159-161.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50935. Epub 2021 Feb 14.