Green Steven M
Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center and Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 May;47(5):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.11.032. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
The trauma center certification requirements of the American College of Surgeons include the expectation that, whenever possible, general surgeons be routinely present at the emergency department arrival of seriously injured patients. The 2 historical factors that originally prompted this requirement, frequent exploratory laparotomies and emergency physicians without trauma training, no longer exist in most modern trauma centers. Research from multiple centers and in multiple varying formats has not identified improvement in patient-oriented outcomes from early surgeon involvement. Surgeons are not routinely present during the resuscitative phase of Canadian and European trauma care, with no demonstrated or perceived decrease in the quality of care. American trauma surgeons themselves do not consistently believe that their use in this capacity is either necessary or an efficient distribution of resources. There is not compelling evidence to support the assumption that trauma outcomes are improved by the routine presence of surgeons on patient arrival. Research is necessary to clarify which trauma patients require either emergency or urgent unique expertise of a general surgeon during the initial phase of trauma management. Individual trauma centers should be permitted the flexibility necessary to perform such research and to use such findings to refine and focus their secondary triage criteria.
美国外科医师学会制定的创伤中心认证要求包括,期望在可能的情况下,普通外科医生在重伤患者抵达急诊科时能常规在场。最初促使这一要求出台的两个历史因素,即频繁进行剖腹探查术以及急诊医生缺乏创伤治疗培训,在大多数现代创伤中心已不复存在。来自多个中心、多种不同形式的研究并未发现早期外科医生参与能改善以患者为导向的治疗结果。在加拿大和欧洲的创伤救治复苏阶段,外科医生并非常规在场,但并未出现护理质量下降的情况,无论是已证实的还是人们察觉到的。美国创伤外科医生自己也并非始终认为,以这种身份参与是必要的,或是资源的有效分配方式。没有令人信服的证据支持这样的假设,即外科医生在患者抵达时常规在场能改善创伤治疗结果。有必要开展研究,以明确在创伤管理初始阶段,哪些创伤患者需要普通外科医生的急诊或紧急特殊专业知识。应允许各个创伤中心具备开展此类研究以及利用此类研究结果来完善和明确其二级分诊标准所需的灵活性。