• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于疑似范围限制而开发金钱管理不善测量方法并进行交叉验证。

Development of a Money Mismanagement Measure and cross-validation due to suspected range restriction.

作者信息

Conrad Kendon J, Matters Michael D, Luchins Daniel J, Hanrahan Patricia, Quasius Danielle L, Lutz George

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1601 W. Taylor Street, 60612 USA.

出版信息

J Appl Meas. 2006;7(2):206-24.

PMID:16632903
Abstract

A measure of the tendency to mismanage money was developed in an evaluation of a representative payee program for individuals with serious mental illnesses. A conceptual model was composed to guide item development, and items were tested, revised, added, and rejected in three waves of data collection. Rasch analyses were used to examine measurement properties. The resulting Money Mismanagement Measure (M3) consisted of 28 items with a Rasch person reliability at .72. Restriction of range was likely responsible for the low Rasch reliability. Validity analyses supported the construct validity of the M3. Subsequently, a cross-validation study was conducted on an untreated sample not as susceptible to range restriction. The M3 produced a Rasch person reliability = .85 with good validity. The M3 fills a gap that can facilitate research in the understudied area of money mismanagement.

摘要

在对一项针对严重精神疾病患者的代表性收款人计划的评估中,开发了一种衡量理财不善倾向的方法。构建了一个概念模型来指导项目开发,并在三轮数据收集过程中对项目进行了测试、修订、添加和剔除。使用拉施分析来检验测量属性。最终的理财不善衡量指标(M3)由28个项目组成,拉施个体信度为0.72。范围限制可能是导致拉施信度较低的原因。效度分析支持了M3的结构效度。随后,对一个不易受范围限制影响的未治疗样本进行了交叉验证研究。M3的拉施个体信度为0.85,效度良好。M3填补了一个空白,有助于在研究较少的理财不善领域开展研究。

相似文献

1
Development of a Money Mismanagement Measure and cross-validation due to suspected range restriction.由于疑似范围限制而开发金钱管理不善测量方法并进行交叉验证。
J Appl Meas. 2006;7(2):206-24.
2
The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.视力损害问卷的影响:使用拉施分析对其测量属性的评估。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Nov;47(11):4732-41. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0220.
3
The Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire: development and validation.隐形眼镜对生活质量的影响(CLIQ)问卷:编制与验证
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jul;47(7):2789-96. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0933.
4
Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.护理研究中Rasch模型的应用:介绍与示例
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):380-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
5
Psychometric properties and cross-cultural equivalence of the Arabic Social Capital Scale: instrument development study.阿拉伯社会资本量表的心理测量特性及跨文化等效性:工具开发研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jan;46(1):44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.07.010. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
6
Development and evaluation of an instrument to measure parental satisfaction with quality of care in neonatal follow-up.用于测量家长对新生儿随访护理质量满意度的工具的开发与评估
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009 Feb;30(1):57-65. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31819670fa.
7
Development and validation of a vision-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for Timor-Leste.东帝汶特定视力生活质量问卷的开发与验证
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;49(10):4284-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1893. Epub 2008 May 23.
8
Rasch psychometric validation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire in people with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者参与度和自主性影响问卷的拉施心理测量学验证
Eura Medicophys. 2007 Dec;43(4):451-61.
9
Constructing indices representing supportiveness of the physical environment for walking using the Rasch measurement model.使用拉施测量模型构建代表步行物理环境支持性的指标。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006 Dec 16;3:44. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-44.
10
Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire.Catquest-9SF患者结局问卷:Catquest问卷的九项简版拉施量表修订版。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):504-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Capability to Manage Finances Stable Over Time?财务管控能力会随时间保持稳定吗?
Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2018 Fall-Winter;21(3-4):280-297.
2
Protocol of a randomized controlled trial to test the effects of client-centered Representative Payee Services on antiretroviral therapy adherence among marginalized people living with HIV.一项随机对照试验方案,旨在测试以客户为中心的代表性收款人服务对边缘化 HIV 感染者抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 23;20(1):1443. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09500-z.
3
Conceptualizing and Assessing Everyday Functioning in the Context of HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders.
概念化和评估与 HIV 相关的神经认知障碍背景下的日常功能。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2021;50:329-346. doi: 10.1007/7854_2018_78.
4
Financial Capability: Clinicians' Assessment of Beneficiaries With Dual Diagnoses.经济能力:临床医生对双重诊断患者的评估
J Dual Diagn. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(2):130-136. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2018.1436732. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Factors Associated with Money Mismanagement Among Adults with Severe Mental Illness and Substance Abuse.重度精神疾病和药物滥用成年人中与资金管理不善相关的因素
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2016 Aug;14(4):400-409. doi: 10.1007/s11469-015-9625-3. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
6
All-data approach to assessing financial capability in people with psychiatric disabilities.评估精神残疾者经济能力的全数据方法。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Apr;28(4):362-371. doi: 10.1037/pas0000179. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
Financial motivation to work among people with psychiatric disorders.精神疾病患者工作的经济动机。
J Ment Health. 2014 Aug;23(4):186-90. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2014.924046.
8
Development of the Clinician Assessment of Financial Incapability (CAFI).临床医生财务能力评估量表(CAFI)的编制。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Mar 30;215(3):784-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.021. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
9
Homelessness and money mismanagement in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.伊拉克和阿富汗退伍军人的无家可归和财务管理不善。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S248-54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301335. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
10
Financial victimization of adults with severe mental illness.成年人严重精神疾病的经济受害情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Sep 1;64(9):918-20. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.005882012.