Suppr超能文献

贲门失弛缓症:我们应该还是不应该遵循“套扎法”?

Achalasia: should we or should we not follow the bag?

作者信息

Wong Roy K H

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;101(4):698-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00581.x.

Abstract

This article concerns the long-term therapeutic effect of pneumatic dilations (PDs) in achalasia. Specifically, it is a retrospective study that follows a large cohort of achalasia patients treated with PD. Efficacy and need for repeat PDs were determined utilizing a score obtained from measuring symptoms after PD. After PDs that resulted in symptomatic improvement, patients were followed at 6-month intervals to determine the need for repeat PD. The major point of this article is that exacerbations of symptoms may occur in 35% of patients undergoing PD; however, follow-up at specific intervals using a symptom score to determine the need for repeat PD resulted in excellent long-term success. This article emphasizes the need for continued follow-up of achalasia patients following initial successful therapy.

摘要

本文关注气囊扩张术(PD)治疗贲门失弛缓症的长期疗效。具体而言,这是一项对大量接受PD治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者进行随访的回顾性研究。利用PD后测量症状所获得的评分来确定疗效及重复进行PD的必要性。在PD后症状得到改善的患者中,每隔6个月进行随访以确定是否需要重复PD。本文的重点是,接受PD治疗的患者中35%可能会出现症状加重;然而,通过使用症状评分在特定间隔进行随访以确定重复PD的必要性,取得了出色的长期治疗效果。本文强调在初始成功治疗后对贲门失弛缓症患者进行持续随访的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验