Suppr超能文献

在贲门失弛缓症治疗中,在气囊扩张术前注射肉毒杆菌毒素:一项随机对照试验。

Injection of botulinum toxin before pneumatic dilatation in achalasia treatment: a randomized-controlled trial.

作者信息

Mikaeli J, Bishehsari F, Montazeri G, Mahdavinia M, Yaghoobi M, Darvish-Moghadam S, Farrokhi F, Shirani S, Estakhri A, Malekzadeh R

机构信息

Digestive Disease Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Sep 15;24(6):983-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03083.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pneumatic dilatation is the first line therapy in achalasia, but half of patients relapse within 5 years of therapy and require further dilatations.

AIM

To assess whether botulinum toxin injection before pneumatic dilatation is superior to pneumatic dilatation alone in achalasia patients.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed achalasia patients were randomly assigned to receive botulinum toxin 1 month before pneumatic dilatation (botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group: 27 patients with median age of 38) or to undergo pneumatic dilatation alone (pneumatic dilatation group: 27 patients with median age of 30). Response to therapy was assessed by clinical and objective methods at various intervals.

RESULTS

One-year remission rate of patients in botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group was 77% compared with 62% in pneumatic dilatation group (P = 0.1). In pneumatic dilatation group, the oesophageal barium volume significantly (P < 0.001) decreased at 1 month, but this reduction did not persist over 1-year follow-up. Botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group showed a significant (P < 0.001) reduction in barium volume at the various times intervals post-treatment. In the botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group, 10/11 (91%) patients over 40 were in remission at 1 year, comparing with only five of nine (55%) cases in pneumatic dilatation group (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Injection of botulinum toxin before pneumatic dilatation does not significantly enhance the efficacy of pneumatic dilatation.

摘要

背景

气囊扩张术是贲门失弛缓症的一线治疗方法,但一半的患者在治疗后5年内复发,需要进一步扩张。

目的

评估在贲门失弛缓症患者中,气囊扩张术前注射肉毒杆菌毒素是否优于单纯气囊扩张术。

方法

将新诊断的贲门失弛缓症患者随机分为两组,一组在气囊扩张术前1个月接受肉毒杆菌毒素治疗(肉毒杆菌毒素-气囊扩张术组:27例患者,中位年龄38岁),另一组仅接受气囊扩张术(气囊扩张术组:27例患者,中位年龄30岁)。在不同时间间隔通过临床和客观方法评估治疗反应。

结果

肉毒杆菌毒素-气囊扩张术组患者的1年缓解率为77%,而气囊扩张术组为62%(P = 0.1)。在气囊扩张术组中,食管钡剂容量在1个月时显著(P < 0.001)下降,但这种下降在1年的随访中未持续。肉毒杆菌毒素-气囊扩张术组在治疗后的不同时间间隔钡剂容量均显著(P < 0.001)下降。在肉毒杆菌毒素-气囊扩张术组中,40岁以上的10/11(91%)患者在1年时缓解,而气囊扩张术组9例患者中只有5例(55%)缓解(P = 0.07)。

结论

气囊扩张术前注射肉毒杆菌毒素并不能显著提高气囊扩张术的疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验