Lemack Gary E, Frohman Elliot M, Zimmern Philippe E, Hawker Kathleen, Ramnarayan Priya
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9110, USA.
Urology. 2006 May;67(5):960-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.061. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
To evaluate the urodynamic characteristics of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) secondary to multiple sclerosis (MS) compared with idiopathic DO (IDO) to determine whether urodynamic distinctions could differentiate the different etiologies of DO.
The urodynamic characteristics of DO in women with MS (n = 54) were compared with the overactive contractions found in women with lower urinary tract symptoms and IDO (n = 42). Among other parameters, the amplitude of the first overactive contraction, maximal detrusor contraction, and threshold volume for the first overactive contraction were evaluated to assess the DO severity. A sensitivity analysis using cutoff values determined from those urodynamic parameters that differed between the patient groups is presented.
The amplitude of the first overactive contraction was statistically greater in the patients with MS and NDO compared with patients with IDO (28.3 cm H2O versus 20.5 cm H2O, P = 0.003), as was the maximal detrusor contraction (46.4 cm H2O versus 30.8 cm H2O, P = 0.002). The threshold volume for DO was greater among patients with NDO (186.8 mL versus 150.5 mL, P = 0.037), likely secondary to the elevated postvoid residual urine volume noted among patients with MS (P = 0.049). Using a cutoff value of 30 cm H2O for amplitude of the first overactive contraction achieved a positive predictive value of 88% for identifying MS in our data set.
The urodynamic characteristics of NDO differed significantly from those of IDO. Additional investigation is required to determine whether these differences are due to neurogenic influences directly on the detrusor muscle through aberrant innervation or by other mechanisms, such as enhanced outlet resistance during voiding.
评估继发于多发性硬化(MS)的神经源性逼尿肌过度活动(NDO)与特发性逼尿肌过度活动(IDO)的尿动力学特征,以确定尿动力学差异是否能够区分不同病因的逼尿肌过度活动。
将MS女性患者(n = 54)的逼尿肌过度活动尿动力学特征与有下尿路症状的IDO女性患者(n = 42)的过度收缩进行比较。除其他参数外,评估首次过度收缩的幅度、最大逼尿肌收缩以及首次过度收缩的阈值容积,以评估逼尿肌过度活动的严重程度。本文呈现了一项敏感性分析,该分析使用了根据患者组间存在差异的尿动力学参数确定的临界值。
与IDO患者相比,MS和NDO患者首次过度收缩的幅度在统计学上更大(28.3 cm H₂O对20.5 cm H₂O,P = 0.003),最大逼尿肌收缩也是如此(46.4 cm H₂O对30.8 cm H₂O,P = 0.002)。NDO患者中逼尿肌过度活动的阈值容积更大(186.8 mL对150.5 mL,P = 0.037),这可能继发于MS患者中观察到的排尿后残余尿量增加(P = 0.049)。在我们的数据集中,使用首次过度收缩幅度的临界值30 cm H₂O来识别MS,阳性预测值达到88%。
NDO的尿动力学特征与IDO有显著差异。需要进一步研究以确定这些差异是由于神经源性通过异常神经支配直接对逼尿肌产生影响,还是由其他机制导致,如排尿期间出口阻力增加。