Pather N, Osman M
School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, 2193 Parktown, South Africa.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2006 May;28(2):170-5. doi: 10.1007/s00276-005-0070-z. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
Facial nerve paralysis is a daunting potential complication of parotid surgery and is widely reported. Knowledge of the key landmarks of the facial nerve trunk is essential for safe and effective surgical intervention in the region of the parotid gland. In current practice, wide ranges of landmarks are used to identify the facial nerve trunk, however, there is much debate in the literature about the safety and reliability of each of these landmarks. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the relation of the surrounding anatomical structures and surgical landmarks to the facial nerve trunk. The anatomical relationship of the facial nerve trunk to the surrounding structures was determined after micro-dissection on 40 adult cadavers. The shortest distances between the facial nerve and the "tragal pointer", attachment of the posterior belly of digastric muscle, tympanomastoid suture, external auditory canal, transverse process of the axis, angle of the mandible and the styloid process were measured. In addition, these distances were compared in the right and left sides, males and females and edentulous and non-edentulous mandibles. The distance of the facial nerve trunk from each of the surrounding landmarks ranged from (mm): tragal pointer, 24.3 to 49.2 (mean 34); posterior belly of digastric, 9.7 to 24.3 (mean 14.6); external auditory canal, 7.3 to 21.9 (mean 13.4); tympanomastoid suture, 4.9 to 18.6 (mean 10.0); styloid process, 4.3 to 18.6 (mean 9.8); transverse process of the axis, 9.7 to 36.8 (mean 16.9); angle of the mandible, 25.3 to 48.69 (mean 38.1). The length of the facial nerve trunk from its point of exit from the stylomastoid foramen to its bifurcation into upper and lower divisions ranged from (mm) 8.6 to 22.8 (mean 14.0). The results demonstrated that the posterior belly of digastric, tragal pointer and transverse process of the axis are consistent landmarks to the facial nerve trunk. However, it should be noted that the tragal pointer is cartilaginous, mobile, asymmetrical and has a blunt, irregular tip. This study advocates the use of the transverse process of the axis as it is easily palpated, does not require a complex dissection and ensures minimum risk of injury to the facial nerve trunk.
面神经麻痹是腮腺手术一种可怕的潜在并发症,已有广泛报道。了解面神经干的关键标志对于腮腺区域安全有效的手术干预至关重要。在当前的实践中,有多种标志用于识别面神经干,然而,文献中对于这些标志中每一个的安全性和可靠性存在诸多争议。因此,本研究的目的是评估周围解剖结构和手术标志与面神经干的关系。在40具成年尸体上进行显微解剖后,确定了面神经干与周围结构的解剖关系。测量了面神经与“耳屏指针”、二腹肌后腹附着点、鼓乳缝、外耳道、枢椎横突、下颌角和茎突之间的最短距离。此外,还比较了左右两侧、男性和女性以及无牙颌和有牙颌下颌的这些距离。面神经干与每个周围标志的距离范围为(毫米):耳屏指针,24.3至49.2(平均34);二腹肌后腹,9.7至24.3(平均14.6);外耳道,7.3至21.9(平均13.4);鼓乳缝,4.9至18.6(平均10.0);茎突,4.3至18.6(平均9.8);枢椎横突,9.7至36.8(平均16.9);下颌角,25.3至48.69(平均38.1)。面神经干从茎乳孔穿出点到其分为上下支的长度范围为(毫米)8.6至22.8(平均14.0)。结果表明,二腹肌后腹、耳屏指针和枢椎横突是面神经干的一致标志。然而,应注意耳屏指针是软骨性的、可移动的、不对称的且尖端钝圆、不规则。本研究提倡使用枢椎横突,因为它易于触及,不需要复杂的解剖,且能确保对面神经干的损伤风险最小。