Shah Ashish S, Nair Satish, Pavithra V, Aishwarya J G, Brijith K V R, Thakur Deeksha
Department of ENT-HNS, Apollo Hospitals, Opp. IIM, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore, Karnataka 560076 India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jun;73(2):188-192. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02329-3. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
Facial nerve identification is considered to be a crucial step in parotid surgery as inadvertent injury to the nerve will lead to facial paralysis. Multiple landmarks are described in literature to identify the facial nerve during parotid surgery but controversies remain as the consistency and accuracy of these landmarks vary. Numerous studies exist in literature but they fail to address a single landmark that is most reliable to identify the facial nerve during parotid surgery. The purpose of this study is to find reliable landmarks for identification of the main trunk of facial nerve during parotid surgery by evidence gathered by cadaveric dissection and intraoperative study during parotid surgery and develop a systematic approach to identify the facial nerve trunk. This prospective study included 41 cadavers (82 parotid regions) and 20 patients with parotid pathology who underwent parotidectomy. We evaluated the feasibility of our C-M-S technique to identify the main trunk of facial nerve in both anatomical and surgical study. The relationship of landmarks (tragal pointer, tympanomastoid suture, superior border of posterior belly of digastric muscle) to the facial nerve trunk was assessed and the shortest distance between them from the facial trunk was measured using a slide caliper. The measurements were compared between the anatomical and surgical study. The main trunk of facial nerve was successfully identified in all cases using C-M-S technique in both anatomical and surgical study. Distance of facial nerve trunk to tragal pointer was more in the cadaveric sample (13.04 ± 5.238 mm) compared to live patients (9.95 ± 3.967 mm) with statistically significant difference = 0.036). The mean distance of tympanomastoid suture and posterior belly of digastric muscle to the facial nerve trunk was similar in anatomical and surgical study with value of 0.877 and 0.083 respectively. The tympanomastoid suture, posterior belly of digastric muscle and tragal pointer are the most useful landmarks for facial nerve identification during parotid surgery. In our study we found that the tympanomastoid suture line is the most consistent landmark present in all our cases and being closest to the facial nerve trunk in both anatomical and surgical study. Further we recommend using the "C-M-S technique" in order to locate the main trunk of the facial nerve.
面神经识别被认为是腮腺手术中的关键步骤,因为不经意间损伤该神经会导致面瘫。文献中描述了多个在腮腺手术中识别面神经的标志,但由于这些标志的一致性和准确性各不相同,争议仍然存在。文献中有大量研究,但它们未能确定在腮腺手术中识别面神经最可靠的单一标志。本研究的目的是通过尸体解剖和腮腺手术中的术中研究收集的证据,找到腮腺手术中识别面神经主干的可靠标志,并开发一种识别面神经主干的系统方法。这项前瞻性研究包括41具尸体(82个腮腺区域)和20例接受腮腺切除术的腮腺病变患者。我们在解剖学和手术研究中评估了我们的C-M-S技术识别面神经主干的可行性。评估了标志(耳屏指针、鼓乳缝、二腹肌后腹上缘)与面神经主干的关系,并使用游标卡尺测量它们与面神经主干之间的最短距离。在解剖学和手术研究之间比较了测量结果。在解剖学和手术研究中,使用C-M-S技术在所有病例中均成功识别出面神经主干。与活体患者(9.95±3.967mm)相比,尸体样本中面神经主干到耳屏指针的距离更大(13.04±5.238mm),差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.036)。在解剖学和手术研究中,鼓乳缝和二腹肌后腹到面神经主干的平均距离相似,P值分别为0.877和0.083。鼓乳缝、二腹肌后腹和耳屏指针是腮腺手术中识别面神经最有用的标志。在我们的研究中,我们发现鼓乳缝线是我们所有病例中最一致的标志,并且在解剖学和手术研究中都最靠近面神经主干。此外,我们建议使用“C-M-S技术”来定位面神经主干。