• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[神经肌肉阻滞对ProSeal喉罩气道漏气压力的影响]

[Influence of neuromuscular blockade on the airway leak pressure of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway].

作者信息

Goldmann K, Hoch N, Wulf H

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie, Philipps Universität Marburg.

出版信息

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2006 Apr;41(4):228-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921200.

DOI:10.1055/s-2005-921200
PMID:16636947
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is increasingly used for surgical procedures that might require the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents. The airway seal of the PLMA depends on the interplay of the surrounding soft tissue of the neck and the cuff of the mask. An intraoperative neuromuscular blockade could lead to a decrease of the airway leak pressure (P (leak)) secondary to the relaxation of the muscles of the neck. With this study we tested the hypothesis that a neuromuscular blockade can result in a decreased P (leak) of the PLMA.

METHODS

The P (leak) of the PLMA was studied in 73 female patients under total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol (0.1 - 0.15 mg kg (-1) min (-1)) and remifentanil (0.1 - 0.3 microg kg (-1) min (-1)) before and after a complete neuromuscular blockade produced by intravenous injection of 0.6 mg kg (-1) Rocuronium.

RESULTS

The P (leak) decreased by more than 10 % of the baseline P (leak) in 8 out of 73 patients (11 %); however, in the entire study population there was no significant difference between the mean baseline P (leak) (28.5 +/- 7.3 cm H(2)O) and the mean P (leak) after complete neuromuscular blockade (29.1 +/- 7.0 cm H(2)O); (p = 0.128).

CONCLUSION

No general correlation between application of a neuromuscular blocking agent and a decrease of the mean P (leak) was found. However, the decrease of the P (leak) by more than 10 % in 11 % of the patients shows that in certain patients the application of neuromuscular blocking agents can result in a decreased P (leak) of the PLMA and indicates the necessity to control the P (leak) of the PLMA under complete muscle paralysis preoperatively when neuromuscular blocking agents are used.

摘要

背景

食管-气管联合导管喉罩气道(PLMA)越来越多地用于可能需要术中使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的手术。PLMA的气道密封取决于颈部周围软组织与喉罩套囊之间的相互作用。术中神经肌肉阻滞可能会导致颈部肌肉松弛,进而引起气道漏气压力(P(leak))降低。在本研究中,我们检验了神经肌肉阻滞会导致PLMA的P(leak)降低这一假设。

方法

在73例接受丙泊酚(0.1 - 0.15 mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)和瑞芬太尼(0.1 - 0.3 μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)全静脉麻醉的女性患者中,研究静脉注射0.6 mg·kg⁻¹罗库溴铵产生完全神经肌肉阻滞后PLMA的P(leak)变化,观察时间点为神经肌肉阻滞前后。

结果

73例患者中有8例(11%)的P(leak)下降超过基线P(leak)的10%;然而,在整个研究人群中,平均基线P(leak)(28.5 ± 7.3 cmH₂O)与完全神经肌肉阻滞后的平均P(leak)(29.1 ± 7.0 cmH₂O)之间无显著差异;(p = 0.128)。

结论

未发现神经肌肉阻滞剂的应用与平均P(leak)降低之间存在普遍相关性。然而,11%的患者P(leak)下降超过10%表明,在某些患者中,神经肌肉阻滞剂的应用可导致PLMA的P(leak)降低,这表明在使用神经肌肉阻滞剂时,术前在完全肌肉麻痹状态下控制PLMA的P(leak)很有必要。

相似文献

1
[Influence of neuromuscular blockade on the airway leak pressure of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway].[神经肌肉阻滞对ProSeal喉罩气道漏气压力的影响]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2006 Apr;41(4):228-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921200.
2
[Airway leak pressure of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Comparison with and without a gastric tube placed through the drain-tube].[ProSeal喉罩气道的气道漏气压力。放置与未放置经引流管的胃管的比较]
Anaesthesist. 2006 Dec;55(12):1255-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1115-3.
3
Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade.在接受神经肌肉阻滞的通气儿童中喉罩气道(LMA)-Proseal与LMA-Classic的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;55(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/BF03017594.
4
A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.在接受压力控制通气的麻痹麻醉成年患者中,喉罩气道ProSeal与喉管气道的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2002 Sep;95(3):770-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200209000-00045.
5
A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study.全麻肌松下喉罩与喉罩 ProSeal 气道在成年患者中应用的比较:一项随机交叉研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;57(7):672-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9312-6. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
6
[An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation].[ProSeal喉罩气道与标准喉罩气道用于正压通气的自动控制比较]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2007 Feb;19(2):81-5.
7
Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation.在控制通气麻醉期间,对ProSeal喉罩气道与喉管进行随机交叉比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Nov;91(5):678-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg239.
8
Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients.在麻醉和瘫痪患者中比较喉罩通气道二代与食管引流型喉罩气道的随机前瞻性研究。
Anesthesiology. 2008 Jul;109(1):54-60. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318178819b.
9
Effect of Paralysis at the Time of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion on Pharyngolaryngeal Morbidities. A Randomized Trial.喉罩置入时行肌松对咽喉部并发症的影响:一项随机试验
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0134130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134130. eCollection 2015.
10
[The applicability of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for laparotomies].[ProSeal喉罩气道在剖腹手术中的适用性]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005 Aug;40(8):477-86. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870103.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of Macintosh laryngoscope-guided insertion of I-gel™ with the conventional blind insertion technique - A randomised study.麦金托什喉镜引导下插入I-gel™与传统盲目插入技术的疗效比较——一项随机研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;66(6):449-455. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_192_22. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
2
Clinical performance of Ambu AuraGain versus i-gel in anesthetized children: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.麻醉儿童中Ambu AuraGain与i-gel的临床性能:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Apr 30;15(2):173-180. doi: 10.17085/apm.2020.15.2.173. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
3
Airway management guidance for the endemic phase of COVID-19.
COVID-19 地方性流行阶段的气道管理指南。
Anaesthesia. 2021 Feb;76(2):251-260. doi: 10.1111/anae.15253. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
4
Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.经口咽漏气压评估喉罩置入条件:盲探与喉镜引导置入的比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 5;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0674-6.
5
A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial.择期手术成年患者中喉罩气道ProSeal、I-gel和Supreme喉罩气道的比较评估:一项随机试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;62(11):858-864. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_153_18.
6
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of LMA ProSeal™ and i-gel® in adults: Meta-analysis and systematic review.成人中喉罩ProSeal™和i-gel®的口咽漏气压及临床性能比较:Meta分析与系统评价
J Int Med Res. 2016 Jun;44(3):405-18. doi: 10.1177/0300060515607386. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
7
Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间i-gel®喉罩与LMA Supreme®喉罩的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct;68(5):455-61. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.455. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
8
Comparison of the i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全身麻醉期间i-gel喉罩与喉罩气道ProSeal的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0119469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119469. eCollection 2015.
9
[Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway devices Ambu AuraOnce and Intersurgical i-gel. Positioning, sealing, patient comfort and airway morbidity].[新型声门上气道装置安普Ambu AuraOnce和英特外科i-gel的评估。定位、密封、患者舒适度及气道并发症]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Aug;58(8):813-20. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1600-6.
10
[Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].[喉罩。可能性与局限性]
Anaesthesist. 2007 Jun;56(6):617-30. doi: 10.1007/s00101-007-1198-5.