Tannenbaum Lawrence V
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2005 Jan;1(1):66-72. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2004a-008.1.
A frank assessment of present-day ecological risk assessments (ERA) for managed contaminated sites reveals that fundamental concepts regarding the receptors that are considered and the chemical exposures they experience are commonly misapplied. As a consequence, environmental managers are not being supplied with the information needed for proper decision making. The stepwise review of ecological risk issues provided here suggests that the ERA process needs I to be severely revamped. Further, what is likely hindering the development of a refined ecological assessment process that is better suited to environmental problem solving and land management is the unwillingness of stakeholders to agree that much of the current ERA practice and convention is flawed.
对当前针对管理污染场地的生态风险评估(ERA)进行坦率评估后发现,关于所考虑的受体以及它们所经历的化学暴露的基本概念普遍被误用。因此,环境管理者没有得到做出正确决策所需的信息。此处对生态风险问题进行的逐步审查表明,ERA过程需要进行大幅改进。此外,利益相关者不愿承认当前许多ERA实践和惯例存在缺陷,这可能正在阻碍更适合环境问题解决和土地管理的精细生态评估过程的发展。