• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国环境保护局对风险评估实践的审查过程中发现的生态风险评估问题。

Ecological risk assessment issues identified during the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's examination of risk assessment practices.

作者信息

Dearfield Kerry L, Bender Edward S, Kravitz Michael, Wentsel Randy, Slimak Michael W, Farland William H, Gilman Paul

机构信息

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Science Advisor, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460, USA.

出版信息

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2005 Jan;1(1):73-6. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2004a-023.1.

DOI:10.1897/ieam_2004a-023.1
PMID:16637150
Abstract

Recently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency examined its current risk-assessment principles and practices. As part of the examination, aspects of ecological risk-assessment practices were reviewed. Several issues related to ecological risk assessment were identified, including the use of organism-level versus population-level attributes to characterize risk, the possible opportunities associated with the increased use of probabilistic approaches for ecological risk assessment, and the notion of conservatism in estimating risks. The agency examination provides an understanding of current practices and is intended to begin a dialogue in which the risk assessment community can engage in addressing the identified issues to improve and enhance ecological risk assessment.

摘要

最近,美国环境保护局审视了其当前的风险评估原则与做法。作为审视的一部分,对生态风险评估做法的各个方面进行了审查。确定了若干与生态风险评估相关的问题,包括使用生物体层面与种群层面的属性来表征风险、生态风险评估中更多使用概率方法可能带来的机遇,以及风险估计中的保守性概念。该机构的审视有助于了解当前的做法,并旨在开启一场对话,让风险评估界能够参与讨论已确定的问题,以改进和加强生态风险评估。

相似文献

1
Ecological risk assessment issues identified during the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's examination of risk assessment practices.在美国环境保护局对风险评估实践的审查过程中发现的生态风险评估问题。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2005 Jan;1(1):73-6. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2004a-023.1.
2
The future direction of ecological risk assessment in the United States: reflecting on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's "Examination of risk assessment practices and principles".美国生态风险评估的未来方向:对美国环境保护局“风险评估实践与原则审查”的思考
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2005 Jan;1(1):77-82. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2004a-024.1.
3
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's examination of its risk assessment principles and practices: a brief perspective from the regulated community.美国环境保护局对其风险评估原则与实践的审视:来自受监管群体的简要观点。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2005 Jan;1(1):86-92. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2004a-018.1.
4
Ecological risk assessment in the United States environmental protection agency: a historical overview.美国环境保护局的生态风险评估:历史概述。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2008 Jul;4(3):285-9. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2007-062. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
5
Protecting Native Americans through the risk assessment process: A commentary on "an examination of U.S. EPA risk assessment principles and practices".通过风险评估过程保护美国原住民:对《美国环境保护局风险评估原则与实践审视》的评论
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2005 Jan;1(1):83-5. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2004a-025.1.
6
Scientific issues in the U.S. EPA Framework for Metals Risk Assessment.美国环保署金属风险评估框架中的科学问题。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010;73(2):108-13. doi: 10.1080/15287390903337084.
7
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's risk assessment guidelines.美国环境保护局的风险评估指南。
Toxicol Ind Health. 1990 Oct;6(5):199-216.
8
Framework for metals risk assessment.金属风险评估框架。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2007 Oct;68(2):145-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.03.015.
9
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
10
Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.美国环保署实施的计算毒理学:为筛选和评估化学暴露、危害和风险提供高通量决策支持工具。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2010 Feb;13(2-4):197-217. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2010.483935.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Growth Targets and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China.经济增长目标与碳排放:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):8053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138053.