Suppr超能文献

《健康保险流通与责任法案》时代的临床研究被动同意

Passive consent for clinical research in the age of HIPAA.

作者信息

Littenberg Benjamin, MacLean Charles D

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Mar;21(3):207-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00339.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Federal laws and regulations, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, intended primarily to protect individuals, have been described as significant barriers to the use of clinical registries and other population-based tools for health care research. Although these regulations allow for the waiver or alteration of usual consent procedures when the research meets certain specific criteria, waivers and alterations are rarely used in health care research.

METHODS

The Vermont Diabetes Information System is a multistate randomized trial of a quality improvement intervention that uses a novel alteration of informed consent to help ensure that the study sample is representative of the target population. Patients are notified by mail that they are eligible for the study and that they may opt out of the study, if they desire, by calling a toll-free number.

RESULTS

Seven thousand five hundred and fifty-eight patients were invited to participate. Two hundred and ten (2.8%) opted out. Three patients (0.04%) filed complaints, all of which were addressed satisfactorily.

CONCLUSIONS

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and other federal regulations raise challenges to the use of clinical registries in research, but modifications to the consent process, including passive consent methods, are useful tools to overcome these challenges. It is possible to recruit a broad and representative population under current law while maintaining appropriate protections for research subjects.

摘要

背景

包括1996年《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)在内的联邦法律法规主要旨在保护个人,但已被视为使用临床登记系统和其他基于人群的医疗保健研究工具的重大障碍。尽管这些法规允许在研究符合某些特定标准时放弃或变更通常的同意程序,但在医疗保健研究中很少使用豁免和变更。

方法

佛蒙特州糖尿病信息系统是一项多州随机试验,是一种质量改进干预措施,采用了一种新颖的知情同意变更方式,以帮助确保研究样本代表目标人群。通过邮件通知患者他们有资格参加研究,如果他们愿意,可以拨打免费电话退出研究。

结果

邀请了7558名患者参与。210名(2.8%)选择退出。3名患者(0.04%)提出投诉,所有投诉均得到满意解决。

结论

《健康保险流通与责任法案》和其他联邦法规给研究中使用临床登记系统带来了挑战,但对同意程序的修改,包括被动同意方法,是克服这些挑战的有用工具。在现行法律下,有可能招募广泛且具有代表性的人群,同时为研究对象提供适当保护。

相似文献

6
HIPAA--Implications for research.《健康保险流通与责任法案》——对研究的影响。
Orthop Nurs. 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):139-42. doi: 10.1097/00006416-200503000-00011.

引用本文的文献

8
Ethical issues in using data from quality management programs.质量管理项目数据使用中的伦理问题。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):321-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0972-2. Epub 2009 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

5
Registries and informed consent.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 5;351(6):612-4; author reply 612-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200408053510621.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验