• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善慢性病患者的初级保健:慢性病照护模式,第2部分。

Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.

作者信息

Bodenheimer Thomas, Wagner Edward H, Grumbach Kevin

机构信息

Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1909-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1909.

DOI:10.1001/jama.288.15.1909
PMID:12377092
Abstract

This article reviews research evidence showing to what extent the chronic care model can improve the management of chronic conditions (using diabetes as an example) and reduce health care costs. Thirty-two of 39 studies found that interventions based on chronic care model components improved at least 1 process or outcome measure for diabetic patients. Regarding whether chronic care model interventions can reduce costs, 18 of 27 studies concerned with 3 examples of chronic conditions (congestive heart failure, asthma, and diabetes) demonstrated reduced health care costs or lower use of health care services. Even though the chronic care model has the potential to improve care and reduce costs, several obstacles hinder its widespread adoption.

摘要

本文回顾了研究证据,这些证据表明慢性病护理模式在何种程度上能够改善慢性病管理(以糖尿病为例)并降低医疗成本。39项研究中的32项发现,基于慢性病护理模式要素的干预措施至少改善了糖尿病患者的1项流程或结果指标。关于慢性病护理模式干预措施能否降低成本,27项涉及3种慢性病实例(充血性心力衰竭、哮喘和糖尿病)的研究中有18项表明医疗成本降低或医疗服务使用减少。尽管慢性病护理模式有改善护理和降低成本的潜力,但仍有几个障碍阻碍其广泛采用。

相似文献

1
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.改善慢性病患者的初级保健:慢性病照护模式,第2部分。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1909-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1909.
2
Incentive-Based Primary Care: Cost and Utilization Analysis.基于激励的初级保健:成本与利用分析。
Perm J. 2015 Fall;19(4):46-56. doi: 10.7812/TPP/15-045. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
3
Patient care. Disease dilemma. Can a case be made for programs that improve health, but may not reduce costs?患者护理。疾病困境。对于那些改善健康状况但可能无法降低成本的项目,能找到支持的理由吗?
Hosp Health Netw. 2005 Apr;79(4):24, 26.
4
Rethinking practitioner roles in chronic illness: the specialist, primary care physician, and the practice nurse.重新思考慢性病领域从业者的角色:专科医生、初级保健医生及执业护士。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2001 May-Jun;23(3):138-44. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(01)00136-0.
5
Disease management programs: benchmarking costs, savings, ROI.疾病管理项目:成本基准、节省金额、投资回报率
Healthc Benchmarks. 1998 Aug;5(8):117-9.
6
For what illnesses is a disease management program most effective?疾病管理项目对哪些疾病最有效?
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Feb;57(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000385.
7
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness.改善慢性病患者的初级护理。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775.
8
Chronic disease management. Made to measure.慢性病管理。量身定制。
Health Serv J. 2003 Aug 21;113(5869):26-7.
9
Managing chronic illness: physician practices increased the use of care management and medical home processes.慢性病管理:医生的诊疗行为增加了对护理管理和医疗之家流程的使用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):78-86. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0404.
10
Examining costs of chronic conditions in a Medicaid population.审视医疗补助人群中慢性病的费用。
Manag Care. 2002 Aug;11(8):43-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of nurse-led self-management education on type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.护士主导的自我管理教育对2型糖尿病的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 11;13:1622988. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1622988. eCollection 2025.
2
Mapping the landscape of machine learning in chronic disease management: A comprehensive bibliometric study.绘制机器学习在慢性病管理中的全景:一项全面的文献计量学研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 23;11:20552076251361614. doi: 10.1177/20552076251361614. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Promoting Health Equity Among People With Opioid Use Disorder and Serious Mental Illness Through the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program.
通过慢性病自我管理项目促进阿片类药物使用障碍和严重精神疾病患者的健康公平。
Subst Use. 2025 May 30;19:29768357251342749. doi: 10.1177/29768357251342749. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Patient Perspectives on Coordinated Care: Preliminary Results from the Implementation Stage Using Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs).患者对协调护理的看法:使用患者报告体验指标(PREMs)在实施阶段的初步结果。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;13(9):1026. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091026.
5
Disparities in cardiovascular disease outcomes and economic burdens among minorities in southeastern Virginia.弗吉尼亚州东南部少数族裔在心血管疾病治疗结果和经济负担方面的差异。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04771-z.
6
Community detection and management of mild cognitive impairment in Shanghai: a mixed-methods study.上海轻度认知障碍的社区检测与管理:一项混合方法研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Jun 12;40(6):613-624. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf025.
7
The long-term general practice healthcare of women with a history of gestational diabetes: A Scoping Review Protocol.有妊娠期糖尿病病史女性的长期全科医疗保健:一项范围综述方案。
HRB Open Res. 2025 Apr 10;8:31. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14022.2. eCollection 2025.
8
Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients.基层医疗人员团队合作以实现慢性病患者的定期随访
Ann Fam Med. 2025 Mar 24;23(2):100-107. doi: 10.1370/afm.240176.
9
Adaptation of a digital health intervention for rural adults: application of the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced.针对农村成年人的数字健康干预措施的调整:《报告调整与修改-增强版框架》的应用
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 18;7:1493814. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1493814. eCollection 2025.
10
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.针对哮喘儿童的家庭式教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD008469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008469.pub3.