Camp E Ramsay, Yang Anthony, Liu Wenbiao, Fan Fan, Somcio Ray, Hicklin Daniel J, Ellis Lee M
Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 15;12(8):2628-33. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2257.
Both nitric oxide (NO) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mediate tumor vascular function. Because these molecules regulate one another's expression, we hypothesized that NO synthase (NOS) inhibition produces effects comparable to those of anti-VEGF therapy on human pancreatic cancer xenografts.
L3.6pl human pancreatic cancer cells were s.c. implanted in nude mice. On day 6, mice were randomized to receive (a) PBS (control), (b) DC101 [VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) antibody] by i.p. injection, (c) N-nitro-l-arginine (NNLA; NOS inhibitor) in the drinking water, or (d) both DC101 and NNLA. Mice were killed on day 20.
DC101 and NNLA as single agents inhibited tumor growth by approximately 50% to 60% (P < 0.008 for both). Furthermore, combined therapy inhibited mean tumor growth by 89% (P < 0.008). Combined inhibition of VEGFR-2 and NOS also decreased mean vessel counts by 65% (P < 0.03) and vessel area by 80% versus controls (P < 0.001). In contrast to DC101 where vessel diameter was similar to control, NNLA decreased mean vessel diameter by 42% (P < 0.001). NNLA also led to a 54% (P < 0.03) decrease in tumor uptake of the perfusion marker Hoechst 33342 versus controls whereas DC101 decreased Hoechst 33342 staining by 43% (P < 0.03). The combination of inhibitors decreased perfusion by 73% (P < 0.03).
Although VEGFR-2 can mediate NOS activity, the combination of VEGFR-2 and NOS inhibition significantly increased the antivascular effect over single agent therapy. The addition of NOS inhibition led to an even further alteration of tumor vessel morphology and vascular perfusion compared with VEGFR-2 blockade, suggesting that NO and VEGFR-2 have distinct but complementary effects on the tumor vasculature.
一氧化氮(NO)和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)均介导肿瘤血管功能。由于这些分子相互调节彼此的表达,我们推测一氧化氮合酶(NOS)抑制产生的效果与抗VEGF治疗对人胰腺癌异种移植瘤的效果相当。
将L3.6pl人胰腺癌细胞皮下植入裸鼠体内。在第6天,将小鼠随机分为四组,分别接受:(a)PBS(对照组);(b)腹腔注射DC101[VEGF受体2(VEGFR - 2)抗体];(c)饮用水中加入N - 硝基 - L - 精氨酸(NNLA;NOS抑制剂);(d)同时给予DC101和NNLA。在第20天处死小鼠。
DC101和NNLA作为单一药物均抑制肿瘤生长约50%至60%(两者P均<0.008)。此外,联合治疗抑制平均肿瘤生长达89%(P<0.008)。与对照组相比,联合抑制VEGFR - 2和NOS还使平均血管计数减少65%(P<0.03),血管面积减少80%(P<0.001)。与血管直径与对照组相似的DC101不同,NNLA使平均血管直径减少42%(P<0.001)。与对照组相比,NNLA还使灌注标记物Hoechst 33342的肿瘤摄取量降低54%(P<0.03),而DC101使Hoechst 33342染色降低43%(P<0.03)。抑制剂联合使用使灌注降低73%(P<0.03)。
尽管VEGFR - 2可介导NOS活性,但VEGFR - 2和NOS抑制联合使用比单一药物治疗显著增强了抗血管生成作用。与VEGFR - 2阻断相比,添加NOS抑制导致肿瘤血管形态和血管灌注发生更显著改变,表明NO和VEGFR - 2对肿瘤血管系统具有不同但互补的作用。