de Kort Y A W, Ijsselsteijn W A
Human-Technology Interaction Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Apr;9(2):230-3. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.230.
There is a growing interest in the use of virtual and other mediated environments for therapeutic purposes. However, in the domain of restorative environments, virtual reality (VR) technology has hardly been used. Here the tendency has been to use mediated real environments, striving for maximum visual realism. This use of photographic material is mainly based on research in aesthetics judgments that has demonstrated the validity of this type of simulations as representations of real environments. Thus, restoration therapy is developing under the untested assumption that photorealistic images have the optimal level of realism, while in therapeutic applications 'experiential realism' seems to be the key rather than visual realism. The present paper discusses this contrast and briefly describes data of three studies aimed at exploring the importance and meaning of realism in the context of restorative environments.
人们越来越关注将虚拟环境和其他媒介环境用于治疗目的。然而,在恢复性环境领域,虚拟现实(VR)技术几乎未被使用。这里的趋势是使用媒介化的真实环境,追求最大程度的视觉真实感。这种对摄影材料的使用主要基于美学判断方面的研究,该研究已证明这类模拟作为真实环境的表征是有效的。因此,恢复疗法是在一个未经检验的假设下发展的,即逼真的图像具有最佳的真实感水平,而在治疗应用中,“体验真实感”似乎才是关键,而非视觉真实感。本文讨论了这种对比,并简要描述了三项旨在探讨恢复性环境背景下真实感的重要性和意义的研究数据。